B Dustin Pooler 1 , Edward M Lawrence , Perry J Pickhardt . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess alternative diagnoses in adults undergoing computed tomography (CT) for suspected acute appendicitis in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was HIPAA compliant and institutional review board approved; informed consent was waived. A total of 1571 consecutive adults were referred from emergency department or urgent care settings for evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis at a single academic medical center from January 2006 to December 2009. Diagnoses given by board-certified radiologists at nonfocused abdominopelvic CT and ultimate clinical diagnoses by a combination of clinical, surgical, pathologic, and other radiologic findings were analyzed. Comparisons were made by using the Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney test, where appropriate, with a two-tailed P value of less than .05 used as the criterion for statistical significance. RESULTS: A specific diagnosis at CT examination was made in 867 of 1571 (55.2%) patients. Acute appendicitis was favored in 371 of 1571 (23.6%) patients. An alternative diagnosis other than appendicitis was suggested in 496 of 1571 (31.6%) patients. Among patients with an alternative CT diagnosis, 204 of 496 (41.1%) were hospitalized and 109 of 496 (22.0%) underwent surgical or image-guided intervention for diagnoses other than appendicitis, compared with rates of 14.1% and 4.4%, respectively, among patients in whom a specific diagnosis was not made at CT (P < .0001). The most common broad categories of disease included nonappendiceal gastrointestinal conditions (46.0%), gynecologic conditions (21.6%), genitourinary conditions (16.9%), and hepatopancreaticobiliary conditions (7.7%). CONCLUSION: In adult patients clinically suspected of having acute appendicitis, abdominopelvic CT frequently identifies an alternative cause for symptoms, which often requires hospitalization and surgery for treatment. © RSNA, 2012.
PURPOSE: To assess alternative diagnoses in adults undergoing computed tomography (CT) for suspected acute appendicitis in routine clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was HIPAA compliant and institutional review board approved; informed consent was waived. A total of 1571 consecutive adults were referred from emergency department or urgent care settings for evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis at a single academic medical center from January 2006 to December 2009. Diagnoses given by board-certified radiologists at nonfocused abdominopelvic CT and ultimate clinical diagnoses by a combination of clinical, surgical, pathologic, and other radiologic findings were analyzed. Comparisons were made by using the Fisher exact test and Mann-Whitney test, where appropriate, with a two-tailed P value of less than .05 used as the criterion for statistical significance. RESULTS: A specific diagnosis at CT examination was made in 867 of 1571 (55.2%) patients . Acute appendicitis was favored in 371 of 1571 (23.6%) patients . An alternative diagnosis other than appendicitis was suggested in 496 of 1571 (31.6%) patients . Among patients with an alternative CT diagnosis, 204 of 496 (41.1%) were hospitalized and 109 of 496 (22.0%) underwent surgical or image-guided intervention for diagnoses other than appendicitis , compared with rates of 14.1% and 4.4%, respectively, among patients in whom a specific diagnosis was not made at CT (P < .0001). The most common broad categories of disease included nonappendiceal gastrointestinal conditions (46.0%), gynecologic conditions (21.6%), genitourinary conditions (16.9%), and hepatopancreaticobiliary conditions (7.7%). CONCLUSION: In adult patients clinically suspected of having acute appendicitis , abdominopelvic CT frequently identifies an alternative cause for symptoms, which often requires hospitalization and surgery for treatment. © RSNA, 2012.
Entities: Disease
Species
Mesh: See more »
Substances: See more »
Year: 2012
PMID: 23023965 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120614
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiology ISSN: 0033-8419 Impact factor: 11.105