BACKGROUND: To decrease the negative appendectomy rate in children, knowledge of the misleading imaging findings on US and CT in negative appendicitis cases is important. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the negative appendectomy rate and describe the imaging findings of US and CT that lead radiologists to misdiagnose acute appendicitis in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2013, 374 children operated for suspected appendicitis were proved to either have acute appendicitis (n = 348) or to be negative for appendicitis (n = 26) on pathological reports. Negative appendectomy rates were compared among imaging modalities, age groups and genders. We retrospectively reviewed US and CT findings from negative appendectomy cases. RESULTS: The overall negative appendectomy rate was 7.0% (26/374). There were no statistically significant differences among the subgroups. The most common misleading presentations on US were sonographic tenderness (9/16, 56%) and non-compressibility (9/16, 56%). The most common misleading finding on CT were the presence of an appendicolith or hyperdense feces (5/12, 42%). Periappendiceal fat inflammation was observed in only one case of negative appendicitis on US and on CT. CONCLUSION: Radiologists can misdiagnose children with equivocal diameters of appendices as having acute appendicitis when sonographic tenderness or non-compressibility is present on US and when an appendicolith or hyperdense feces is noted on CT. The possibility of negative appendicitis should be borne in mind when periappendiceal fat inflammation is absent or minimal in indeterminate cases.
BACKGROUND: To decrease the negative appendectomy rate in children, knowledge of the misleading imaging findings on US and CT in negative appendicitis cases is important. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the negative appendectomy rate and describe the imaging findings of US and CT that lead radiologists to misdiagnose acute appendicitis in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2007 to 2013, 374 children operated for suspected appendicitis were proved to either have acute appendicitis (n = 348) or to be negative for appendicitis (n = 26) on pathological reports. Negative appendectomy rates were compared among imaging modalities, age groups and genders. We retrospectively reviewed US and CT findings from negative appendectomy cases. RESULTS: The overall negative appendectomy rate was 7.0% (26/374). There were no statistically significant differences among the subgroups. The most common misleading presentations on US were sonographic tenderness (9/16, 56%) and non-compressibility (9/16, 56%). The most common misleading finding on CT were the presence of an appendicolith or hyperdense feces (5/12, 42%). Periappendiceal fat inflammation was observed in only one case of negative appendicitis on US and on CT. CONCLUSION: Radiologists can misdiagnose children with equivocal diameters of appendices as having acute appendicitis when sonographic tenderness or non-compressibility is present on US and when an appendicolith or hyperdense feces is noted on CT. The possibility of negative appendicitis should be borne in mind when periappendiceal fat inflammation is absent or minimal in indeterminate cases.
Authors: Joseph W Stengel; Emily M Webb; Liina Poder; Benjamin M Yeh; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Fergus V Coakley Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-05-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Tolulope A Oyetunji; Sharon K Ong'uti; Oluwaseyi B Bolorunduro; Edward E Cornwell; Benedict C Nwomeh Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2011-05-19 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Jose M Pereira; Claude B Sirlin; Pedro S Pinto; R Brooke Jeffrey; Damien L Stella; Giovanna Casola Journal: Radiographics Date: 2004 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Joseph Cuschieri; Michael Florence; David R Flum; Gregory J Jurkovich; Paul Lin; Scott R Steele; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Richard Thirlby Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Patrick L Wagner; Soumitra R Eachempati; Kevin Soe; Frederic M Pieracci; Jian Shou; Philip S Barie Journal: Surgery Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.982