Literature DB >> 23017115

Longitudinal deformation of contemporary coronary stents: an integrated analysis of clinical experience and observations from the bench.

Mohamed Abdel-Wahab1, Dmitriy S Sulimov, Guido Kassner, Volker Geist, Ralph Toelg, Gert Richardt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report clinical experience with longitudinal stent deformation (LSD) and observations from the bench.
BACKGROUND: LSD was recently reported with thin-strut coronary stents. Whether it is related to a particular stent or constitutes a class-effect remains debatable.
METHODS: After 2 cases of LSD were reported, information was sent to operators to warn of this event and identify possible cases. All cases were reviewed to ensure LSD had occurred. Simultaneously, bench testing was conducted to identify the susceptibility of stents to longitudinal compression and whether LSD detection is influenced by fluoroscopic stent visibility.
RESULTS: Between July 2010 and November 2011, 2,705 coronary interventions were performed with 4,588 stents (Promus Element = 41.6%, Xience Prime = 24.4%). Six patients with LSD were identified, all with Promus Element (0.31%). Wire bias was a predisposing factor in 4 cases. All patients were treated with postdilatation and/or additional stenting. No adverse events occurred (mean 5.8 months). In bench testing, LSD occured in all examined stents, but at different levels of applied force (weight). Most shortening at 50 g was observed with Promus Element (38.9%), as was the best visibility of LSD on x-ray images. With postdilatation all stents showed some re-elongation.
CONCLUSION: In our practice LSD was a rare observation only seen with the Promus Element stent. When subjected to longitudinal compression in a bench test all contemporary stents can be compressed. Compression of Promus Element occurs at a lower force, but it is the only stent where deformations are detected with x ray. Postdilatation can partially improve LSD. ©2012, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23017115     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2012.00765.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  5 in total

1.  The potential hazard of a non-slip element balloon causing distal longitudinal stent deformation: the first clinical experience and in vitro assessment.

Authors:  Hiroki Shibutani; Yuzo Akita; Yohei Oishi; Hiroyuki Sueyoshi; Yu Mukai; Kotaro Yutaka; Yumie Matsui; Masahiro Yoshinaga; Masahiro Karakawa
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.737

2.  Clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics of longitudinal stent deformation.

Authors:  A Guler; Y Guler; E Acar; S M Aung; S C Efe; A Kilicgedik; C Y Karabay; S Barutcu; M K Tigen; S Pala; A İzgi; A M Esen; C Kirma
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Longitudinal stent elongation or shortening after deployment in the coronary arteries: which is dominant?

Authors:  Magdy Algowhary; Mohammed Aboel-Kassem F Abdelmegid
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2021-05-17

4.  A Fractional Flow Reserve Guidewire Causing Longitudinal Stent Compression and Successful Recovery.

Authors:  Metzdorf Pierre-Adrien; Maigrat Charles-Henri; Popovic Batric; Camenzind Edoardo
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

5.  In vivo measurement of stent length by using intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Magdy Algowhary; Salma Taha; Hosam Hasan-Ali; Akihiko Matsumura
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2019-12-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.