PURPOSE: The urological Dyna-CT (Uro Dyna-CT) was established in clinical use for classical imaging as well as for interventional surgery. To evaluate whether irradiation artefacts may occur during interventional surgery, we analysed the impact of different instruments on 3D reconstruction in the Uro Dyna-CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten different endourological instruments [ureterorenoscope (URS)-fibrescope, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) working sheath] and accessory equipments such as ureteral catheter, guide wires and stents (DJ, MJ) were introduced in a porcine renal pelvis either retrograde via the ureter or transparenchymally. Subsequently, digital fluoroscopy, standard X-ray and an Uro Dyna-CT were performed. Three colleagues evaluated the image quality independent from each other. RESULTS: There were basically no limitations regarding image quality in digital fluoroscopy and standard X-ray. In the Uro Dyna-CT, only with the URS fiberscope and the PCNL working sheath, small artefacts and irradiations were detected, whereas ureteric catheter with and without wire, as well as the hydrophilic guide wire, showed no artefacts at all. The remaining material demonstrated minimal artefacts, which did not affect the image quality. CONCLUSIONS: The Uro Dyna-CT can be used for all interventional endourological procedures using the common armamentarium and instruments without significant limitation of image quality. There are only minor limitations according a PCNL working sheath and the rigid URS. These instruments should be removed out of the examination field before performing the computed tomography and be replaced afterwards by using a safety wire.
PURPOSE: The urological Dyna-CT (Uro Dyna-CT) was established in clinical use for classical imaging as well as for interventional surgery. To evaluate whether irradiation artefacts may occur during interventional surgery, we analysed the impact of different instruments on 3D reconstruction in the Uro Dyna-CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten different endourological instruments [ureterorenoscope (URS)-fibrescope, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) working sheath] and accessory equipments such as ureteral catheter, guide wires and stents (DJ, MJ) were introduced in a porcine renal pelvis either retrograde via the ureter or transparenchymally. Subsequently, digital fluoroscopy, standard X-ray and an Uro Dyna-CT were performed. Three colleagues evaluated the image quality independent from each other. RESULTS: There were basically no limitations regarding image quality in digital fluoroscopy and standard X-ray. In the Uro Dyna-CT, only with the URS fiberscope and the PCNL working sheath, small artefacts and irradiations were detected, whereas ureteric catheter with and without wire, as well as the hydrophilic guide wire, showed no artefacts at all. The remaining material demonstrated minimal artefacts, which did not affect the image quality. CONCLUSIONS: The Uro Dyna-CT can be used for all interventional endourological procedures using the common armamentarium and instruments without significant limitation of image quality. There are only minor limitations according a PCNL working sheath and the rigid URS. These instruments should be removed out of the examination field before performing the computed tomography and be replaced afterwards by using a safety wire.
Authors: Jean de la Rosette; Dean Assimos; Mahesh Desai; Jorge Gutierrez; James Lingeman; Roberto Scarpa; Ahmet Tefekli Journal: J Endourol Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Frank K Wacker; Sherif G Nour; Rosana Eisenberg; Jeffrey L Duerk; Jonathan S Lewin Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Hannes G Kenngott; Martin Wagner; Matthias Gondan; Felix Nickel; Marco Nolden; Andreas Fetzer; Jürgen Weitz; Lars Fischer; Stefanie Speidel; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Dittmar Böckler; Markus W Büchler; Beat P Müller-Stich Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 4.584