Literature DB >> 23008374

Duodenal perforation secondary to migration of endobiliary prosthesis.

Peter Smart1, Declan Keenan, William Campbell, Gareth Morris-Stiff.   

Abstract

A 27-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with abdominal pain, four days post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and insertion of an endobiliary stent. A plain abdominal film highlighted the stent in an atypical position within the abdomen. As such, the patient progressed to a CT scan, confirming a retroperitoneal perforation of the duodenum by the stent. Laparotomy returned the stent to the duodenum with a primary duodenal repair. This case highlights the high index of suspicion required in patients who present with acute abdominal pain post-ERCP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23008374      PMCID: PMC4543542          DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2012-006711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Case Rep        ISSN: 1757-790X


  14 in total

1.  Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  E Masci; G Toti; A Mariani; S Curioni; A Lomazzi; M Dinelli; G Minoli; C Crosta; U Comin; A Fertitta; A Prada; G R Passoni; P A Testoni
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Sigmoid colon perforation following a migrated biliary stent.

Authors:  Michael Elliott; Stuart Boland
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.872

3.  [Perforation of the sigmoid due to a duodeno-biliary stent displacement].

Authors:  J Hain; D Berndt; M Hrubý
Journal:  Rozhl Chir       Date:  2010-05

Review 4.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.

Authors:  P B Cotton; G Lehman; J Vennes; J E Geenen; R C Russell; W C Meyers; C Liguory; N Nickl
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study.

Authors:  S Loperfido; G Angelini; G Benedetti; F Chilovi; F Costan; F De Berardinis; M De Bernardin; A Ederle; P Fina; A Fratton
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Early retroduodenal perforation following endoscopic internal biliary drainage.

Authors:  R Coppola; R Masetti; M E Riccioni; S Ciletti; A De Franco; M Detweiler; P Magistrelli; A Picciocchi
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  M L Freeman; J A DiSario; D B Nelson; M B Fennerty; J G Lee; D J Bjorkman; C S Overby; J Aas; M E Ryan; G S Bochna; M J Shaw; H W Snady; R V Erickson; J P Moore; J P Roel
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  T J Howard; T Tan; G A Lehman; S Sherman; J A Madura; E Fogel; M L Swack; K K Kopecky
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Retroperitoneal perforation of the duodenum from biliary stent erosion.

Authors:  George Miller; Duke Yim; Michael Macari; Marsha Harris; Peter Shamamian
Journal:  Curr Surg       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct

10.  Gut perforation caused by biliary endoprosthesis.

Authors:  R H Størkson; B Edwin; O Reiertsen; A E Faerden; O Sortland; A R Rosseland
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  2 in total

1.  Sudden appearance of free fluid during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.

Authors:  Mihai Rimbas; Marian Deaconu; Alexandru Croitoru; Andrei Haidar
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.628

Review 2.  Duodenal perforations secondary to a migrated biliary plastic stent successfully treated by endoscope: case-report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Wang; Junwen Qu; Kewei Li
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.067

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.