Literature DB >> 10520912

Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy.

T J Howard1, T Tan, G A Lehman, S Sherman, J A Madura, E Fogel, M L Swack, K K Kopecky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of perforations after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) is controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the treatments and outcome of patients with ES perforations.
METHODS: Between January 1994 and July 1998, in a series of 6040 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies, 2874 (48%) ESs were performed: 40 patients (0.6%) with perforation were identified and retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: All patients (n = 14) with guidewire perforation (group I) were recognized early, managed medically, and discharged after a mean hospital stay of 3.5 days. Twenty of 22 patients with periampullary perforation (group II) were identified early; 18 patients (90%) had aggressive endoscopic drainage, and none required operation. Of the 2 patients identified late, 1 patient required operation and subsequently died. Mean hospital stay for this group was 8.5 days. Only 1 of 4 patients with duodenal perforations (group III) was identified early; all required operation; 1 patient died, and the mean hospital stay was 19.5 days.
CONCLUSIONS: ES perforation has 3 distinct types: guidewire, periampullary, and duodenal. Guidewire perforations are recognized early and resolve with medical treatment. Periampullary perforations diagnosed early respond to aggressive endoscopic drainage and medical treatment. Postsphincterotomy perforations diagnosed late (particularly duodenal) require surgical drainage, which carries a high morbidity and mortality rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10520912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  69 in total

1.  Re: Stapfer M et al. Management of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy. Ann Surg 2000; 232:191-8.

Authors:  T J Howard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Clinical outcomes of patients who experienced perforation associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Jaihwan Kim; Sang Hyub Lee; Woo Hyun Paik; Byeong Jun Song; Jin Hyeok Hwang; Ji Kon Ryu; Yong-Tae Kim; Yong Bum Yoon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Unusual penetration of plastic biliary stent in a large ampullary carcinoma: A case report.

Authors:  H Kerem Tolan; Tassanee Sriprayoon; Thawatchai Akaraviputh
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-06-16

4.  Primary endoscopic approximation suture under cap-assisted endoscopy of an ERCP-induced duodenal perforation.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Lee; Byoung Wook Bang; Jee In Jeong; Hyung Gil Kim; Seok Jeong; Seon Mee Park; Don Haeng Lee; Sang-Heum Park; Sun-Joo Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Retroduodenal perforation without sphincterotomy: a case report.

Authors:  John Menachery; Yogesh Chawla; Ajay Duseja; Radha K Dhiman; Naveen Kalra; Sameer Vankar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Pneumopericardium, pneumomediastinum, pneumoretroperitoneum and surgical emphysema secondary to a duodenal perforation post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Joshua Paul Harvey
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-18

7.  Endoscopic fibrin sealant closure of duodenal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Hsin-Yeh Yang; Jui-Hao Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  A tailored approach to the management of perforations following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and sphincterotomy.

Authors:  Andreas Polydorou; Antonios Vezakis; Georgios Fragulidis; Demetrios Katsarelias; Constantinos Vagianos; Georgios Polymeneas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Severe and fatal complications after ERCP: analysis of 2555 procedures in a single experienced center.

Authors:  P Salminen; S Laine; R Gullichsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Proposal of an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation management guideline based on perforation type.

Authors:  Wooil Kwon; Jin-Young Jang; Ji Kon Ryu; Yong-Tae Kim; Yong Bum Yoon; Mee Joo Kang; Sun-Whe Kim
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.