Literature DB >> 23002024

Visual short-term memory always requires general attention.

Candice C Morey1, Malte Bieler.   

Abstract

The role of attention in visual memory remains controversial; while some evidence has suggested that memory for binding between features demands no more attention than does memory for the same features, other evidence has indicated cognitive costs or mnemonic benefits for explicitly attending to bindings. We attempted to reconcile these findings by examining how memory for binding, for features, and for features during binding is affected by a concurrent attention-demanding task. We demonstrated that performing a concurrent task impairs memory for as few as two visual objects, regardless of whether each object includes one or more features. We argue that this pattern of results reflects an essential role for domain-general attention in visual memory, regardless of the simplicity of the to-be-remembered stimuli. We then discuss the implications of these findings for theories of visual working memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23002024     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0313-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  27 in total

1.  Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference.

Authors:  R Dell'Acqua; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Storage of features, conjunctions and objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  E K Vogel; G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  The effects of processing time and processing rate on forgetting in working memory: testing four models of the complex span paradigm.

Authors:  Annekatrin Hudjetz; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

4.  How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis.

Authors:  Akira Miyake; Naomi P Friedman; David A Rettinger; Priti Shah; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-12

5.  Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.

Authors:  Edward K Vogel; Andrew W McCollough; Maro G Machizawa
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  How does processing affect storage in working memory tasks? Evidence for both domain-general and domain-specific effects.

Authors:  Christopher Jarrold; Helen Tam; Alan D Baddeley; Caroline E Harvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Interference with visualization.

Authors:  W A Phillips; D F Christie
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  How to measure working memory capacity in the change detection paradigm.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Richard D Morey; Candice C Morey; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

9.  Comment on "Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision".

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?

Authors:  Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-05
View more
  29 in total

1.  Visual and verbal working memory loads interfere with scene-viewing.

Authors:  Deborah A Cronin; Candace E Peacock; John M Henderson
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Decay theory of immediate memory: From Brown (1958) to today (2014).

Authors:  Timothy J Ricker; Evie Vergauwe; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.143

3.  Normalization of network connectivity in hemispatial neglect recovery.

Authors:  Lenny E Ramsey; Joshua S Siegel; Antonello Baldassarre; Nicholas V Metcalf; Kristina Zinn; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Short-term memory based on activated long-term memory: A review in response to Norris (2017).

Authors:  Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Theories of Working Memory: Differences in Definition, Degree of Modularity, Role of Attention, and Purpose.

Authors:  Eryn J Adams; Anh T Nguyen; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Tone series and the nature of working memory capacity development.

Authors:  Katherine M Clark; Kyle O Hardman; Todd R Schachtman; J Scott Saults; Bret A Glass; Nelson Cowan
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2017-11-27

7.  Retrieval from long-term memory reduces working memory representations for visual features and their bindings.

Authors:  Amanda E van Lamsweerde; Melissa R Beck; Emily M Elliott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-02

8.  What happens to an individual visual working memory representation when it is interrupted?

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2018-08-01

9.  Visual working memory declines when more features must be remembered for each object.

Authors:  Klaus Oberauer; Simon Eichenberger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-11

10.  Development of the ability to combine visual and acoustic information in working memory.

Authors:  Nelson Cowan; Yu Li; Bret A Glass; J Scott Saults
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-11-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.