PURPOSE: Many authors reported that microsurgical varicocelectomy was among the best treatment modalities for varicocele. However, the difference in intraoperative anatomic detail between macroscopic and microsurgical varicocele repair in the same spermatic cord has not been critically discussed. METHODS: Between August 2010 and February 2011, 32 men with 42 sides' grade 2-3 varicocele were enrolled in this study. One surgeon firstly mimicked the modified open varicocelectomy by identifying, isolating, and marking the presumed internal spermatic veins, lymphatics, and arteries. Another surgeon then checked the same spermatic cord using operating microscope to investigate the number of missed veins, to be ligated lymphatics and arteries in the "imitative" open varicocelectomy. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the average number of internal spermatic arteries (1.67 vs. 0.91), internal spermatic veins (6.45 vs. 4.31), and lymphatics (2.93 vs. 1.17) between microscopic and macroscopic procedure (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Meanwhile, an average of 2.14 ± 1.26 internal spermatic veins was missed; among them, 1.63 ± 1.32 internal spermatic veins adherent to the preserved testicular artery were overlooked. The number of 0.69 ± 0.84 lymphatics and 0.74 ± 0.74 arteries were to be ligated in "macroscopic varicocelectomy." A number of 1.07 ± 1.11 lymphatics were neither identified nor ligated. In addition, in 2 cases, the vasal vessels of the vas deferens were to be ligated at macroscopic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical varicocelectomy could preserve more internal spermatic arteries and lymphatic and ligate more veins which may interpret the superiority of microsurgical varicocele repair.
PURPOSE: Many authors reported that microsurgical varicocelectomy was among the best treatment modalities for varicocele. However, the difference in intraoperative anatomic detail between macroscopic and microsurgical varicocele repair in the same spermatic cord has not been critically discussed. METHODS: Between August 2010 and February 2011, 32 men with 42 sides' grade 2-3 varicocele were enrolled in this study. One surgeon firstly mimicked the modified open varicocelectomy by identifying, isolating, and marking the presumed internal spermatic veins, lymphatics, and arteries. Another surgeon then checked the same spermatic cord using operating microscope to investigate the number of missed veins, to be ligated lymphatics and arteries in the "imitative" open varicocelectomy. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the average number of internal spermatic arteries (1.67 vs. 0.91), internal spermatic veins (6.45 vs. 4.31), and lymphatics (2.93 vs. 1.17) between microscopic and macroscopic procedure (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Meanwhile, an average of 2.14 ± 1.26 internal spermatic veins was missed; among them, 1.63 ± 1.32 internal spermatic veins adherent to the preserved testicular artery were overlooked. The number of 0.69 ± 0.84 lymphatics and 0.74 ± 0.74 arteries were to be ligated in "macroscopic varicocelectomy." A number of 1.07 ± 1.11 lymphatics were neither identified nor ligated. In addition, in 2 cases, the vasal vessels of the vas deferens were to be ligated at macroscopic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical varicocelectomy could preserve more internal spermatic arteries and lymphatic and ligate more veins which may interpret the superiority of microsurgical varicocele repair.
Authors: Jonathan P Jarow; Ira D Sharlip; Arnold M Belker; Larry I Lipshultz; Mark Sigman; Anthony J Thomas; Peter N Schlegel; Stuart S Howards; Ajay Nehra; Marian D Damewood; James W Overstreet; Richard Sadovsky Journal: J Urol Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: S De Stefani; V Silingardi; S Micali; A Mofferdin; M C Sighinolfi; A Celia; G Bianchi; S Giulini; A Volpe; F Giusti; A Maiorana Journal: Andrologia Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 2.775
Authors: Jason Ronald Kovac; Jake Fantus; Larry I Lipshultz; Marc Anthony Fischer; Zachery Klinghoffer Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 1.862