Literature DB >> 17169654

Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with and without testicular delivery.

Ranjith Ramasamy1, Peter N Schlegel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of the delivery of testis on semen parameters, serum testosterone, and pregnancy rates after varicocelectomy, performed with and without delivery of the testis.
METHODS: A total of 165 patients with clinically diagnosed varicoceles who underwent surgical ligation with (n = 55) or without (n = 110) testicular delivery were included in this study. Patients were followed up postoperatively at 3, 6, and 9 to 24 months. The postoperative outcome was assessed by determination of the semen parameters, testosterone level, varicocele recurrence, and pregnancy rate.
RESULTS: No varicocele recurrences were clinically detectable after either surgical approach. The mean increase in motile sperm/ejaculate after varicocelectomy without testicular delivery was significant (P <0.05) for grade II and III varicoceles. When the testis was delivered, the increase was significant only for grade III varicoceles. No statistically significant difference was found in the change in motile sperm/ejaculate between the two cohorts for all three varicocele grades. The overall pregnancy rate was also not significantly different between the two groups. The testosterone levels rose from 323 to 471 ng/dL on average (P <0.05) after varicocelectomy without testicular delivery but did not change in men who had testicular delivery. The change in testosterone level, age, and testicular volume did not correlate with either the increase in semen parameters or the grade of varicocele treated.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that varicocelectomy without testicular delivery has equivalent or more beneficial effects on semen parameters without affecting varicocele recurrence rates. Delivery of the testis did not offer any beneficial effects on semen quality or pregnancy rates after varicocelectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17169654     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  17 in total

Review 1.  The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility.

Authors:  Matthew A Will; Jason Swain; Mikkel Fode; Jens Sonksen; Gregory M Christman; Dana Ohl
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Varicocelectomy: microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy is the treatment of choice.

Authors:  Saleh Binsaleh; Kirk C Lo
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Male factor infertility: innovations in varicocele surgery.

Authors:  Joel Marmar
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Microsurgical varicocelectomy: a review.

Authors:  Akanksha Mehta; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Macroscopic and microsurgical varicocelectomy: what's the intraoperative difference?

Authors:  Xiaopeng Liu; Hao Zhang; Xingxing Ruan; Hengjun Xiao; Wentao Huang; Liaoyuan Li; Xin Gao; Yan Zhang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Microanatomy of the spermatic cords during microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy: initial experience in Asian men.

Authors:  Xue-Ke Wang; Hong-Zhen Wang; Ding-Jun Fu; Ming-Kuen Lai
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Magnification-assisted subinguinal varicocelectomy with testicular delivery in children: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Suk Ju Cho; Seong Cheol Kim; Kun Suk Kim; Sungchan Park
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 5.400

8.  Anatomical factors affecting the time required for microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Jung Keun Lee; Ho Young Ryu; Jae-Seung Paick; Soo Woong Kim
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-08

Review 9.  The evolution and refinements of varicocele surgery.

Authors:  Joel L Marmar
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 10.  My indications for treatment of the adolescent varicocele (and why?).

Authors:  Kenneth I Glassberg
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.