Literature DB >> 22425089

The impact of varicocelectomy on sperm parameters: a meta-analysis.

Ingrid Schauer1, Stephan Madersbacher, Romy Jost, Wilhelm Alexander Hübner, Martin Imhof.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined the impact of 3 surgical techniques (high ligation, inguinal varicocelectomy and the subinguinal approach) for varicocelectomy on sperm parameters (count and motility) and pregnancy rates.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: By searching the literature using MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library with the last search performed in February 2011, focusing on the last 20 years, a total of 94 articles published between 1975 and 2011 reporting on sperm parameters before and after varicocelectomy were identified. Inclusion criteria for this meta-analysis were at least 2 semen analyses (before and 3 or more months after the procedure), patient age older than 19 years, clinical subfertility and/or abnormal semen parameters, and a clinically palpable varicocele. To rule out skewing factors a bias analysis was performed, and statistical analysis was done with RevMan5(®) and SPSS 15.0(®).
RESULTS: A total of 14 articles were included in the statistical analysis. All 3 surgical approaches led to significant or highly significant postoperative improvement of both parameters with only slight numeric differences among the techniques. This difference did not reach statistical significance for sperm count (p = 0.973) or sperm motility (p = 0.372). After high ligation surgery sperm count increased by 10.85 million per ml (p = 0.006) and motility by 6.80% (p <0.00001) on the average. Inguinal varicocelectomy led to an improvement in sperm count of 7.17 million per ml (p <0.0001) while motility changed by 9.44% (p = 0.001). Subinguinal varicocelectomy provided an increase in sperm count of 9.75 million per ml (p = 0.002) and sperm motility by 12.25% (p = 0.001). Inguinal varicocelectomy showed the highest pregnancy rate of 41.48% compared to 26.90% and 26.56% after high ligation and subinguinal varicocelectomy, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that varicocelectomy leads to significant improvements in sperm count and motility regardless of surgical technique, with the inguinal approach offering the highest pregnancy rate.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22425089     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  24 in total

Review 1.  The Role of Varicocele in Male Factor Subfertility.

Authors:  Dillon Sedaghatpour; Boback M Berookhim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Treating varicocele in 2018: current knowledge and treatment options.

Authors:  M Zavattaro; C Ceruti; G Motta; S Allasia; L Marinelli; C Di Bisceglie; M P Tagliabue; M Sibona; L Rolle; F Lanfranco
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 3.  Microsurgical varicocelectomy: a review.

Authors:  Akanksha Mehta; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Macroscopic and microsurgical varicocelectomy: what's the intraoperative difference?

Authors:  Xiaopeng Liu; Hao Zhang; Xingxing Ruan; Hengjun Xiao; Wentao Huang; Liaoyuan Li; Xin Gao; Yan Zhang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Robotic assisted andrological surgery.

Authors:  Sijo J Parekattil; Ahmet Gudeloglu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 6.  Use of Ultrasound in Male Infertility: Appropriate Selection of Men for Scrotal Ultrasound.

Authors:  Joseph M Armstrong; Sorena Keihani; James M Hotaling
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Oxidative Stress and Varicocele-Associated Male Infertility.

Authors:  Terence Chun-Ting Lai; Shubhadeep Roychoudhury; Chak-Lam Cho
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  Semen parameters and chromatin packaging in microsurgical varicocelectomy patients.

Authors:  Marziyeh Tavalaee; Homayon Abbasi; Mohammad Reza Deemeh; Farinaz Fotohi; Mohammad Ali Sadoughi Gilani; Mohammad Hossein Nasr Esfahani
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-12-17

Review 9.  Who will benefit from surgical repair for painful varicocele: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Da-Yu Han; Qi-Yun Yang; Xu Chen; Bin Ouyang; Bing Yao; Gui-Hua Liu; Heng Zhang; Kai Xia; Chun-Hua Deng; Xiang-Zhou Sun
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Surgical or radiological treatment for varicoceles in subfertile men.

Authors:  Emma Persad; Clare Aa O'Loughlin; Simi Kaur; Gernot Wagner; Nina Matyas; Melanie Rosalia Hassler-Di Fratta; Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.