Literature DB >> 1433614

Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique.

M Goldstein1, B R Gilbert, A P Dicker, J Dwosh, C Gnecco.   

Abstract

Conventional techniques of varicocele repair are associated with substantial risks of hydrocele formation, ligation of the testicular artery, and varicocele recurrence. We describe a microsurgical technique of varicocelectomy that significantly lowers the incidence of these complications. The testicle is delivered through a 2 to 3 cm. inguinal incision, and all external spermatic and gubernacular veins are ligated. The testis is returned to the scrotum and the spermatic cord is dissected under the operating microscope. The testicular artery and lymphatics are identified and preserved. All internal spermatic veins are doubly ligated with small hemoclips or 4-zero silk and divided. The vas deferens and its vessels are preserved. Initially, we performed 33 conventional inguinal varicocelectomies in 24 men without delivery of the testis or use of a microscope. Postoperatively, 3 unilateral hydroceles (9%) and 3 unilateral recurrences (9%) were detected. For the next 12 cases 2.5x loupes were used resulting in no hydroceles but another recurrence (8%). We then performed 640 varicocelectomies in 429 men using the microsurgical technique with delivery of the testis. Among 382 men available for followup examination from 6 months to 7 years postoperatively no hydroceles and no cases of testicular atrophy were found. A total of 4 unilateral recurrent varicoceles (0.6%) was identified. The differences between the techniques in the incidence of hydrocele formation and varicocele recurrence are highly significant (p < 0.001). No wound infections occurred in any men. Four scrotal hematomas (0.6%), 1 of which required surgical drainage, occurred in the group with microsurgical ligation and delivery of the testis compared to none with the conventional technique. Preoperative and postoperative semen analyses (mean 3.57 analyses per patient) were obtained on 271 men. The changes in sperm count x 10(6) cc (36.9 to 46.8, p < 0.001), per cent motility (39.6 to 45.7%, p < 0.001) and per cent normal forms (48.4 to 52.10%, p < 0.001) were highly significant. The pregnancy rate was 152 of 357 couples (43%) followed for a minimum of 6 months postoperatively. Delivery of the testis through a small inguinal incision provides direct visual access to all possible avenues of testicular venous drainage. The operating microscope allows identification of the testicular artery, lymphatics and small venous channels. This minimally invasive, outpatient technique results in a significant decrease in the incidence of hydrocele formation, testicular artery injury and varicocele recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1433614     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37035-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  59 in total

Review 1.  The great debate: varicocele treatment and impact on fertility.

Authors:  Matthew A Will; Jason Swain; Mikkel Fode; Jens Sonksen; Gregory M Christman; Dana Ohl
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  1H NMR-based metabonomics for infertility diagnosis in men with varicocele.

Authors:  Filipe Tenorio Lira Neto; Ronmilson Alves Marques; Alexandre de Freitas Cavalcanti Filho; Leslie Clifford Noronha Araujo; Salvador Vilar Correia Lima; Licarion Pinto; Ricardo Oliveira Silva
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Current management of adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  D A Paduch; S J Skoog
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2001

4.  Comprehensive laparoscopic approach to pediatric varicocele based on preoperative color Doppler ultrasound assessment.

Authors:  M Cimador; M R Di Pace; M Castagnetti; M Sergio; P Catalano; E De Grazia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Dr. Zini's rebuttal.

Authors:  Armand Zini
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Varicocelectomy: microsurgical subinguinal technique is the treatment of choice.

Authors:  Armand Zini
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Varicocelectomy: microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy is the treatment of choice.

Authors:  Saleh Binsaleh; Kirk C Lo
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Varicocele and hypogonadism.

Authors:  Ali Dabaja; Matthew Wosnitzer; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.092

9.  Semen parameters and chromatin packaging in microsurgical varicocelectomy patients.

Authors:  Marziyeh Tavalaee; Homayon Abbasi; Mohammad Reza Deemeh; Farinaz Fotohi; Mohammad Ali Sadoughi Gilani; Mohammad Hossein Nasr Esfahani
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-12-17

Review 10.  Oxidation-reduction potential of semen: what is its role in the treatment of male infertility?

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Shubhadeep Roychoudhury; Kimberly B Bjugstad; Chak-Lam Cho
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2016-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.