BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Numerous imaging techniques have been developed and applied to evaluate brain hemodynamics. Among these are positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, Xenon-enhanced computed tomography, dynamic perfusion computed tomography, MRI dynamic susceptibility contrast, arterial spin labeling, and Doppler ultrasound. These techniques give similar information about brain hemodynamics in the form of parameters such as cerebral blood flow or cerebral blood volume. All of them are used to characterize the same types of pathological conditions. However, each technique has its own advantages and drawbacks. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: This article addresses the main imaging techniques dedicated to brain hemodynamics. It represents a comparative overview established by consensus among specialists of the various techniques. CONCLUSIONS: For clinicians, this article should offer a clearer picture of the pros and cons of currently available brain perfusion imaging techniques and assist them in choosing the proper method for every specific clinical setting.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Numerous imaging techniques have been developed and applied to evaluate brain hemodynamics. Among these are positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography, Xenon-enhanced computed tomography, dynamic perfusion computed tomography, MRI dynamic susceptibility contrast, arterial spin labeling, and Doppler ultrasound. These techniques give similar information about brain hemodynamics in the form of parameters such as cerebral blood flow or cerebral blood volume. All of them are used to characterize the same types of pathological conditions. However, each technique has its own advantages and drawbacks. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: This article addresses the main imaging techniques dedicated to brain hemodynamics. It represents a comparative overview established by consensus among specialists of the various techniques. CONCLUSIONS: For clinicians, this article should offer a clearer picture of the pros and cons of currently available brain perfusion imaging techniques and assist them in choosing the proper method for every specific clinical setting.
Authors: Angelika Hoffmann; Jörg Bredno; Michael F Wendland; Nikita Derugin; Jason Hom; Tibor Schuster; Hua Su; Peter T Ohara; William L Young; Max Wintermark Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-06-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Erin M Buckley; Dalton Hance; Thomas Pawlowski; Jennifer Lynch; Felice B Wilson; Rickson C Mesquita; Turgut Durduran; Laura K Diaz; Mary E Putt; Daniel J Licht; Mark A Fogel; Arjun G Yodh Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Turgut Durduran; Chao Zhou; Erin M Buckley; Meeri N Kim; Guoqiang Yu; Regine Choe; J William Gaynor; Thomas L Spray; Suzanne M Durning; Stefanie E Mason; Lisa M Montenegro; Susan C Nicolson; Robert A Zimmerman; Mary E Putt; Jiongjiong Wang; Joel H Greenberg; John A Detre; Arjun G Yodh; Daniel J Licht Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Angelika Hoffmann; Jörg Bredno; Michael F Wendland; Nikita Derugin; Jason Hom; Tibor Schuster; Claus Zimmer; Hua Su; Peter T Ohara; William L Young; Max Wintermark Journal: Transl Stroke Res Date: 2012-09-16 Impact factor: 6.829
Authors: Rui Wang; Songlin Yu; Jeffry R Alger; Zhentao Zuo; Juan Chen; Rong Wang; Jing An; Bo Wang; Jizong Zhao; Rong Xue; Danny J J Wang Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-02-21 Impact factor: 5.315