Literature DB >> 22993651

The clinical utility of anti-chromatin antibodies as measured by BioPlex 2200 in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus versus other rheumatic diseases.

Nilanjana Bose1, Xiaofeng Wang, Majula Gupta, Qingping Yao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The detection of autoantibodies is indispensable to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Bioplex 2200 ANA screen is a multiplex immunoassay system that allows simultaneous determination of autoantibodies to extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) including anti-chromatin antibodies (ACAs). However, the clinical significance of the ACAs by this new method in SLE patients has not been studied in comparison with other rheumatic disorders. We performed a retrospective study of patients with rheumatic diseases to assess the diagnostic value of the ACAs by Bioplex 2200 method in SLE.
METHODS: Adult patients with rheumatic complaints seen by rheumatologists at the Cleveland Clinic between January 2008 and February 2010 were screened for positive anti-ENA antibodies by the Bioplex 2200. Patients with positive anti-ENA antibodies were classified into two populations based upon the presence and absence of the ACAs. We retrospectively studied the clinical and laboratory data of these patients.
RESULTS: A total of 764 subjects with positive anti-ENA antibodies were screened, including 115 with positive ACAs. There were 93 SLE patients consisting of 58 with positive ACAs and 35 with negative ACAs. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the ACAs in SLE were 62.4%, 91.5%, 50.4% and 94.6% respectively. Apart from SLE, positive ACAs were associated with mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD)/undifferentiated CTD (UCTD) and other autoimmune diseases. No correlation was found between the ACAs and lupus glomerulonephritis or anti-dsDNA antibodies.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of the ACAs by the Bioplex 2200 is specific for diagnosing SLE but not useful for differentiating between SLE and MCTD/UCTD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BioPlex 2200; Systemic lupus erythematosus; anti-ENA antibodies; anti-chromatin antibodies

Year:  2012        PMID: 22993651      PMCID: PMC3443891     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  15 in total

1.  Anti-chromatin antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus: a useful marker for lupus nephropathy.

Authors:  R Cervera; O Viñas; M Ramos-Casals; J Font; M García-Carrasco; A Sisó; F Ramírez; Y Machuca; J Vives; M Ingelmo; R W Burlingame
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 ANA screen: analysis of 510 healthy subjects: incidence of natural/predictive autoantibodies.

Authors:  O Shovman; B Gilburd; O Barzilai; E Shinar; B Larida; G Zandman-Goddard; S R Binder; Y Shoenfeld
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 3.  Antinucleosome antibodies and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Z Amoura; H Chabre; J F Bach; S Koutouzov
Journal:  Adv Nephrol Necker Hosp       Date:  1997

4.  Comparison of automated multiplexed bead-based ANA screening assay with ELISA for detecting five common anti-extractable nuclear antigens and anti-dsDNA in systemic rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Yoonjung Kim; Yongjung Park; Eun Young Lee; Hyon-Suk Kim
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.786

5.  Anti-nucleosome antibody: significance in lupus patients lacking anti-double-stranded DNA antibody.

Authors:  D J Min; S J Kim; S H Park; Y I Seo; H J Kang; W U Kim; C S Cho; H Y Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.473

6.  Measurement of autoantibodies using multiplex methodology in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  John G Hanly; Kara Thompson; Grace McCurdy; Lisa Fougere; Chris Theriault; Kathleen Wilton
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  BioPlex 2200 multiplexed system: simultaneous detection of anti-dsDNA and anti-chromatin antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Nathalie Bardin; Sophie Desplat-Jego; Laurent Daniel; Noemie Jourde Chiche; Marielle Sanmarco
Journal:  Autoimmunity       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.815

8.  Anti-nucleosome antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus of recent onset. Potential utility as a diagnostic tool and disease activity marker.

Authors:  J A Simón; J Cabiedes; E Ortiz; J Alcocer-Varela; J Sánchez-Guerrero
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Antinucleosome antibodies in SLE: a two-year follow-up study of 101 patients.

Authors:  A Ghirardello; A Doria; S Zampieri; E Tarricone; R Tozzoli; D Villalta; N Bizzaro; A Piccoli; P F Gambari
Journal:  J Autoimmun       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.094

10.  Relationship between anti-dsDNA, anti-nucleosome and anti-alpha-actinin antibodies and markers of renal disease in patients with lupus nephritis: a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jessica J Manson; Alexander Ma; Pauline Rogers; Lesley J Mason; Jo H Berden; Johan van der Vlag; David P D'Cruz; David A Isenberg; Anisur Rahman
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison study of bead-based and line-blot multiplex ANA immunoassays in the diagnosis of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Weiru Yuan; Hua Cao; Weiping Li; Xinyi Wu; Jie Zheng
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  The spectrum of anti-chromatin/nucleosome autoantibodies: independent and interdependent biomarkers of disease.

Authors:  Sonal Mehra; Marvin J Fritzler
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 4.818

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.