Literature DB >> 16014555

Evaluation of the BioPlex 2200 ANA screen: analysis of 510 healthy subjects: incidence of natural/predictive autoantibodies.

O Shovman1, B Gilburd, O Barzilai, E Shinar, B Larida, G Zandman-Goddard, S R Binder, Y Shoenfeld.   

Abstract

The BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen is a fully automated system that determines levels for 13 different autoimmune antibodies of established clinical significance. The objective of this study was to determine the specificity of the BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen assay and to analyze the antibody profile samples collected from healthy subjects against comparative ELISA and IIF screening methods. A total of 510 specimens were randomly selected from a cohort of apparently healthy blood bank donors. Samples were distributed to five age brackets. All samples were tested using Bio-Rad's ANA Screen kit. Specificity was compared to IIF and ELISA results. Most of the samples were found negative in all ANA screening systems (84.5% by IIF, 92.5% by BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen kit, and 94.5% by ELISA). The frequency of positive results was highest (15.5%) using IIF, in comparison to almost similar results (5.5% vs. 7.5%) achieved by ANA ELISA and BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen kits. The positive rate of autoantibodies was significantly reduced when analyzed by different combinations of ANA screen assays (from 2.35% using IIF + BioPlex ANA Screen tests to 0.98% by using all three tests). Using the BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen system, we were able to identify samples with high levels of individual antibodies: anti-dsDNA at 20-63 IU/mL, antichromatin at 4-8 AI, anti-SmRNP at 2-6 AI, and anti-RNPA at 2-4.5 AI. Importantly, from 7 IIF and ELISA positive sera, 5 of these were also BioPlex 2200 positive, suggesting that the BioPlex is seeing the samples that are of the greatest interest, using the established techniques. The specificity of the BioPlex 2200 ANA Screen analysis of 13 different analytes (dsDNA, centromere B, chromatin, Jo1, ribosomal P, RNP 68, RNP A, Scl-70, Sm, SmPNP, SS-A52, SS-A60, SS-B) is comparable (P < 0.252) to the ELISA ANA screening test. Like the ELISA, the BioPlex 2200 has a lower (P < 0.001) positive rate than IIF for the autoantibody screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16014555     DOI: 10.1196/annals.1313.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  33 in total

Review 1.  Do antiphospholipid antibodies develop for a purpose?

Authors:  Joan T Merrill
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Multiplexed protein measurement: technologies and applications of protein and antibody arrays.

Authors:  Stephen F Kingsmore
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Feasibility of a multiplex flow cytometric bead immunoassay for detection of anti-epoetin alfa antibodies.

Authors:  John Ferbas; John Thomas; John Hodgson; Amitabh Gaur; Nicole Casadevall; Steven J Swanson
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-07-18

4.  Gastrointestinal-associated autoantibodies in different autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  Dana Ben-Ami Shor; Hedi Orbach; Mona Boaz; Arie Altman; Juan-Manuel Anaya; Nicola Bizzaro; Angela Tincani; Ricard Cervera; Gerard Espinosa; Ljudmila Stojanovich; Blaž Rozman; Stefano Bombardieri; Salvatore De Vita; Jan Damoiseaux; Danilo Villalta; Elio Tonutti; Renato Tozzoli; Ori Barzilai; Maya Ram; Miri Blank; Nancy Agmon-Levin; Yehuda Shoenfeld
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2012-05-25

5.  Analytical variability in the determination of anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies: the strong need of a better definition of the old and new tests.

Authors:  Maria Infantino; M Manfredi; M Merone; V Grossi; M Benucci; F Li Gobbi; F Bandinelli; A Damiani; P Soda
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.829

6.  Protein array autoantibody profiles for insights into systemic lupus erythematosus and incomplete lupus syndromes.

Authors:  Q-Z Li; J Zhou; A E Wandstrat; F Carr-Johnson; V Branch; D R Karp; C Mohan; E K Wakeland; N J Olsen
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Geographical differences in autoantibodies and anti-infectious agents antibodies among healthy adults.

Authors:  Yinon Shapira; Bat-Sheva Poratkatz; Boris Gilburd; Ori Barzilai; Maya Ram; Miri Blank; Staffan Lindeberg; Johan Frostegård; Juan-Manuel Anaya; Nicola Bizzaro; Luis J Jara; Jan Damoiseaux; Yehuda Shoenfeld; Nancy Agmon Levin
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.667

8.  Clinical performance evaluation of a novel, automated chemiluminescent immunoassay, QUANTA Flash CTD Screen Plus.

Authors:  Chelsea Bentow; Gabriella Lakos; Rachel Rosenblum; Cassandra Bryant; Andrea Seaman; Michael Mahler
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.829

9.  Evaluation of an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay kit for antinuclear antibodies in autoimmune diseases.

Authors:  Yaron Zafrir; Boris Gilburd; Marina Garcia Carrasco; Shaye Kivity; María Sánchez-Castañón; Marcos López-Hoyos; Mathilda Mandel; Magdalena Szmyrka; Yehuda Shoenfeld; Nancy Agmon-Levin
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.829

10.  60 kD Ro and nRNP A frequently initiate human lupus autoimmunity.

Authors:  Latisha D Heinlen; Micah T McClain; Lauren L Ritterhouse; Benjamin F Bruner; Colin C Edgerton; Michael P Keith; Judith A James; John B Harley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.