Literature DB >> 15041044

Antinucleosome antibodies in SLE: a two-year follow-up study of 101 patients.

A Ghirardello1, A Doria, S Zampieri, E Tarricone, R Tozzoli, D Villalta, N Bizzaro, A Piccoli, P F Gambari.   

Abstract

We prospectively analyzed the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as well as the clinical relevance of antinucleosome antibodies in SLE. One hundred and one consecutive SLE patients were followed for 3 years. Three serial serum samples from each patient were tested for antinucleosome antibodies by ELISA (optimum cut-off value 10 U/ml), and for anti-dsDNA antibody (by ELISA and IIF on Crithidia luciliae), and anti-dsDNA avidity (by Scatchard plot analysis). Sera from 100 healthy individuals (HI), 35 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), 30 with primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS), 20 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 48 with infectious diseases (ID), were assayed as controls. SLE activity and damage were evaluated using the ECLAM score and the SLICC/ACR index. At baseline, antinucleosome antibodies were found in 87 patients with SLE (86.1%), in 8 patients with SSc (22.8%), in 2 HI (2%), and in 1 ID (2.1%). The sensitivity and specificity of antinucleosome testing for SLE were 86.1% and 95.3%, respectively. The prevalence of antinucleosome antibodies in SLE was significantly higher than that of anti-dsDNA antibodies, with a correlation between them. No relevant relationship was found between antinucleosome antibodies and disease features, including renal involvement, disease activity, and disease damage. During follow-up, no significant variation was observed in antinucleosome level, nor in anti-dsDNA antibody level or avidity. We conclude that antinucleosome antibodies are commonly found in SLE. Low antibody levels can be detected in SSc, whereas medium/high levels are highly specific for SLE. Their clinical relevance during the disease course and utility for monitoring the individual patient seem to be poor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15041044     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2003.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Autoimmun        ISSN: 0896-8411            Impact factor:   7.094


  18 in total

1.  The clinical utility of anti-chromatin antibodies as measured by BioPlex 2200 in the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus versus other rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Nilanjana Bose; Xiaofeng Wang; Majula Gupta; Qingping Yao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2012-08-22

2.  Antinucleosome in systemic lupus erythematosus. A study in a Brazilian population.

Authors:  G A Sardeto; L M Simas; T S Skare; R M Nisihara; S R R Utiyama
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Immunoserological parameters in SLE: high-avidity anti-dsDNA detected by ELISA are the most closely associated with the disease activity.

Authors:  Sladjana Andrejevic; Ivica Jeremic; Mirjana Sefik-Bukilica; Milos Nikolic; Biljana Stojimirovic; Branka Bonaci-Nikolic
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  A prospective study of anti-chromatin and anti-C1q autoantibodies in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis treated with cyclophosphamide pulses or azathioprine/methylprednisolone.

Authors:  Cecile Grootscholten; Jürgen W C Dieker; Fabian D McGrath; Anja Roos; Ronald H W M Derksen; Johan van der Vlag; Mohamed R Daha; Jo H M Berden
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 5.  Clinical guidelines and definitions of autoinflammatory diseases: contrasts and comparisons with autoimmunity-a comprehensive review.

Authors:  M Zen; M Gatto; M Domeneghetti; L Palma; E Borella; L Iaccarino; L Punzi; A Doria
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 8.667

6.  Anti-chromatin and anti-histone antibodies in Egyptian patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Adel A Shabana; Atef E El-Ghawet; Shereen A Machaly; Ekbal M Abu Hashim; Basma A El-Kady; Reham Shaat
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 7.  IgM antibodies against dsDNA in SLE.

Authors:  Torsten Witte
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.667

8.  Assessment of a high-avidity IgG ANAs for the diagnosis and activity prediction of systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Yanli Zeng; Yiqiang Lin; Xuelian Wang; Yan Zhang; Feng Peng; JiaJia Wang; Longcan Jiang; Shiqiong Liang; Yun Xiao
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Clinical and serological correlates of antinucleosome antibodies in South Africans with systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  M Tikly; T Gould; A A Wadee; E van der Westhuizen; B B N Mokgethwa
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Relationship between anti-dsDNA, anti-nucleosome and anti-alpha-actinin antibodies and markers of renal disease in patients with lupus nephritis: a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jessica J Manson; Alexander Ma; Pauline Rogers; Lesley J Mason; Jo H Berden; Johan van der Vlag; David P D'Cruz; David A Isenberg; Anisur Rahman
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.