Literature DB >> 8497235

Multiformat video and laser cameras: history, design considerations, acceptance testing, and quality control. Report of AAPM Diagnostic X-Ray Imaging Committee Task Group No. 1.

J E Gray1, W F Anderson, C C Shaw, S J Shepard, L A Zeremba, P J Lin.   

Abstract

Acceptance testing and quality control of video and laser cameras is relatively simple, especially with the use of the SMPTE test pattern. Photographic quality control is essential if one wishes to be able to maintain the quality of video and laser cameras. In addition, photographic quality control must be carried out with the film used clinically in the video and laser cameras, and with a sensitometer producing a light spectrum similar to that of the video or laser camera. Before the end of the warranty period a second acceptance test should be carried out. At this time the camera should produce the same results as noted during the initial acceptance test. With the appropriate acceptance and quality control the video and laser cameras should produce quality images throughout the life of the equipment.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8497235     DOI: 10.1118/1.597036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  5 in total

1.  User and system interface issues in the purchase of imaging and information systems.

Authors:  S Langer; J Wang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  A digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) print service for chest imaging.

Authors:  D M Tucker; C T Suitor; S J Shepard; D F Schomer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  ACR-AAPM-SIIM practice guideline for determinants of image quality in digital mammography.

Authors:  Kalpana M Kanal; Elizabeth Krupinski; Eric A Berns; William R Geiser; Andrew Karellas; Martha B Mainiero; Melissa C Martin; Samir B Patel; Daniel L Rubin; Jon D Shepard; Eliot L Siegel; Judith A Wolfman; Tariq A Mian; Mary C Mahoney
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Image quality control for digital mammographic systems: initial experience and outlook.

Authors:  H Roehrig; T Yu; E Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Dry imaging cameras.

Authors:  Ik Indrajit; Aftab Alam; Hirdesh Sahni; Mukul Bhatia; Samaresh Sahu
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2011-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.