Literature DB >> 22990647

Utilization of mastectomy and reconstruction in the outpatient setting.

Laura Kruper1, Xin Xin Xu, Katherine Henderson, Leslie Bernstein, Steven L Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction rates after mastectomy have been reported to range from 25-40%; however, most studies have focused on patients treated in an inpatient setting. We sought to determine the utilization of outpatient mastectomy and use of breast reconstruction in Southern California.
METHODS: Postmastectomy reconstruction rates were determined from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database from 2006-2009 using CPT codes and similarly from an inpatient database using ICD-9 codes. Reconstruction rates were compared between the inpatient and outpatient setting. For the outpatient setting, univariate and multivariate odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated for relative odds of immediate reconstruction versus mastectomy alone.
RESULTS: The percentage of patients undergoing outpatient mastectomy ranged from 20.4 to 23.9% of the total number of all patients undergoing mastectomy. Whereas immediate inpatient reconstruction increased from 29.2 to 41.6% (overall rate 35.5%), the proportion of outpatients undergoing reconstruction only increased from 7.7 to 10.3% (overall rate 9.1%). Similar to the inpatient setting, in multivariate analysis, age, insurance status, race/ethnicity, and type of hospital were significantly associated with the use of reconstruction in the outpatient setting.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of patients undergo outpatient mastectomy with low rates of reconstruction. Although the choice of an outpatient mastectomy may certainly represent a selection bias for those not choosing reconstruction, an increase in the use of outpatient mastectomy may result in decreases in the use of postmastectomy reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22990647      PMCID: PMC3819218          DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2661-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  31 in total

1.  Outpatient mastectomy: clinical, payer, and geographic influences.

Authors:  C Case; M Johantgen; C Steiner
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on wound complications after breast surgery.

Authors:  Marquita R Decker; David Y Greenblatt; Jeff Havlena; Lee G Wilke; Caprice C Greenberg; Heather B Neuman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  A prospective and randomized study, "SVEA," comparing effects of three methods for delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result.

Authors:  Y Brandberg; M Malm; L Blomqvist
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  A portable mechanical pump providing over four days of patient-controlled analgesia by perineural infusion at home.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; F Kayser Enneking
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.288

5.  Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database study.

Authors:  M Morrow; S K Scott; H R Menck; T A Mustoe; D P Winchester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  J H Rowland; K A Desmond; B E Meyerowitz; T R Belin; G E Wyatt; P A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  How frequent is postmastectomy breast reconstructive surgery? A study linking two statewide databases.

Authors:  A P Polednak
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S K Al-Ghazal; L Fallowfield; R W Blamey
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study.

Authors:  E G Wilkins; P S Cederna; J C Lowery; J A Davis; H M Kim; R S Roth; S Goldfarb; P H Izenberg; H P Houin; K W Shaheen
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  The national utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction and the effect of sociodemographic factors.

Authors:  Amy K Alderman; Laurence McMahon; Edwin G Wilkins
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  11 in total

1.  Influence of Patient and Hospital Characteristics on the Performance of Direct Reconstruction after Mastectomy.

Authors:  J Hartrampf; L Ansmann; S Wesselmann; M W Beckmann; H Pfaff; C Kowalski
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Emerging trends in surgical and adjuvant radiation therapies among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Oyewale O Shiyanbola; Brian L Sprague; John M Hampton; Kim Dittus; Ted A James; Sally Herschorn; Ronald E Gangnon; Donald L Weaver; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  Association of peripheral nerve blocks with patient-reported quality of recovery in female patients receiving breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Authors:  Kuo-Chuan Hung; Ching-Chung Ko; Jen-Yin Chen; Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Chih-Wei Hsu; Yu-Li Pang
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 6.713

4.  Indications for readmission following mastectomy for breast cancer: An assessment of patient and operative factors.

Authors:  Jennifer Yu; Margaret A Olsen; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  One-Year Experience of Same-Day Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Protocol.

Authors:  Michelle C Specht; Bridget N Kelly; Eleanor Tomczyk; Olivia A Ford; Alexandra J Webster; Barbara L Smith; Michelle A Gadd; Amy S Colwell; Eric C Liao
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.339

6.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on alloplastic breast reconstruction: An analysis of national outcomes.

Authors:  Sarah N Chiang; Michael J Finnan; Gary B Skolnick; Justin M Sacks; Joani M Christensen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.885

7.  Association of a Policy Mandating Physician-Patient Communication With Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Elham Mahmoudi; Yiwen Lu; Allan K Metz; Adeyiza O Momoh; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  Breast reconstruction after mastectomy at a comprehensive cancer center.

Authors:  Shahnjayla K Connors; Melody S Goodman; Terence Myckatyn; Julie Margenthaler; Sarah Gehlert
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-02

9.  High-Efficiency Same-Day Approach to Breast Reconstruction During the COVID-19 Crisis.

Authors:  Michelle Specht; Nikhil Sobti; Nikki Rosado; Eleanor Tomczyk; Olivia Abbate; Dan Ellis; Eric C Liao
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Outpatient Mastectomy: Factors Influencing Patient Selection and Predictors of Return to Care.

Authors:  Brooke Vuong; Jennifer R Dusendang; Sharon B Chang; Margaret Ann Mentakis; Veronica C Shim; Julie Schmittdiel; Gillian Kuehner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 6.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.