Literature DB >> 25568467

Influence of Patient and Hospital Characteristics on the Performance of Direct Reconstruction after Mastectomy.

J Hartrampf1, L Ansmann1, S Wesselmann2, M W Beckmann3, H Pfaff1, C Kowalski4.   

Abstract

Aim: International studies have shown that the performance of a direct (or immediate) reconstruction (DR) after mastectomy is associated with patient (e.g., socio-economic status, insurance status, age) and hospital (number of cases, teaching status) characteristics. The present article addresses the question if such relationships also exist in Germany. Material and
Methods: The results of a nationwide questionnaire to the patients of certified breast cancer centres were coupled with the clinical features of the patients and the characteristics of the hospital. Predictors for receiving a DR (vs. delayed or no reconstruction) were estimated by means of a logistic multilevel model for a sample of 1165 patients from 105 certified locations.
Results: Substantial differences between the treating hospitals were found (intraclass correlation coefficient null model: 0.195) which can in part be explained by the total model (total model: 0.169). Patients with the following features are more likely to receive a DR: younger age, private health insurance, secondary school leaving certificate (vs. primary school leaving certificate), lower stage and acquisition of more information about reconstruction. ASA and partnership status are not statistically significantly related with DR. DR is more likely to be performed in hospitals with higher caseload of patients with primary breast cancer. Teaching status, operations per surgeon and urbanity of the location are not related to receiving a DR. Conclusions: Non-clinical features of the patients and the primary case number are associated with the performance of a DR, this poses questions concerning reasons and the equality of health care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  certified breast cancer centres; immediate reconstruction; minimum numbers; multilevel analysis

Year:  2014        PMID: 25568467      PMCID: PMC4275316          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  33 in total

1.  Socioeconomic position and breast reconstruction in Danish women.

Authors:  Gitte B Hvilsom; Lisbet R Hölmich; Kirsten Frederiksen; Marianne Steding-Jessen; Søren Friis; Susanne O Dalton
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  An analysis of immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction frequency using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

Authors:  Shailesh Agarwal; Lisa Pappas; Leigh Neumayer; Jayant Agarwal
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.431

3.  Patterns of care for immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction following mastectomy.

Authors:  Sue A Joslyn
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review.

Authors:  Rebecca Say; Madeleine Murtagh; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-02

5.  Immediate postmastectomy reconstruction is associated with improved breast cancer-specific survival: evidence and new challenges from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

Authors:  Michael Bezuhly; Claire Temple; Leif J Sigurdson; Roger B Davis; Gordon Flowerdew; E Francis Cook
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Multilevel analysis of the impact of community vs patient factors on access to immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy in Maryland.

Authors:  Gedge D Rosson; Navin K Singh; Nita Ahuja; Lisa K Jacobs; David C Chang
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-11

7.  The Patients' View On Accredited Breast Cancer Centers: Strengths and Potential for Improvement.

Authors:  C Kowalski; S Wesselmann; R Kreienberg; H Schulte; H Pfaff
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.915

8.  Satisfaction with and psychological impact of immediate and deferred breast reconstruction.

Authors:  J Fernández-Delgado; M J López-Pedraza; J A Blasco; E Andradas-Aragones; J I Sánchez-Méndez; G Sordo-Miralles; M M Reza
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Time and Resources Needed to Document Patients with Breast Cancer from Primary Diagnosis to Follow-up - Results of a Single-center Study.

Authors:  M P Lux; C S Sell; P A Fasching; J Seidl-Ertel; M R Bani; M G Schrauder; S M Jud; C R Loehberg; C Rauh; A Hartmann; R Schulz-Wendtland; V Strnad; M W Beckmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 10.  Immediate versus delayed reconstruction following surgery for breast cancer.

Authors:  Nigel D'Souza; Geraldine Darmanin; Zbys Fedorowicz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-07-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Quality assessment in prostate cancer centers certified by the German Cancer Society.

Authors:  Christoph Kowalski; Julia Ferencz; Peter Albers; Jan Fichtner; Thomas Wiegel; Günter Feick; Simone Wesselmann
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Are There Disparities in Surgical Treatment for Breast Cancer Patients with Prior Physical Disability A Path Analysis.

Authors:  Lena Ansmann; Alfred Schabmann; Sophie Elisabeth Gross; Anke Gross-Kunkel; Ute-Susann Albert; Igor Osipov
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 2.860

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.