Literature DB >> 20980584

Vibrotactile masking experiments reveal accelerated somatosensory processing in congenitally blind braille readers.

Arindam Bhattacharjee1, Amanda J Ye, Joy A Lisak, Maria G Vargas, Daniel Goldreich.   

Abstract

Braille reading is a demanding task that requires the identification of rapidly varying tactile patterns. During proficient reading, neighboring characters impact the fingertip at ∼100 ms intervals, and adjacent raised dots within a character at 50 ms intervals. Because the brain requires time to interpret afferent sensorineural activity, among other reasons, tactile stimuli separated by such short temporal intervals pose a challenge to perception. How, then, do proficient Braille readers successfully interpret inputs arising from their fingertips at such rapid rates? We hypothesized that somatosensory perceptual consolidation occurs more rapidly in proficient Braille readers. If so, Braille readers should outperform sighted participants on masking tasks, which demand rapid perceptual processing, but would not necessarily outperform the sighted on tests of simple vibrotactile sensitivity. To investigate, we conducted two-interval forced-choice vibrotactile detection, amplitude discrimination, and masking tasks on the index fingertips of 89 sighted and 57 profoundly blind humans. Sighted and blind participants had similar unmasked detection (25 ms target tap) and amplitude discrimination (compared with 100 μm reference tap) thresholds, but congenitally blind Braille readers, the fastest readers among the blind participants, exhibited significantly less masking than the sighted (masker, 50 Hz, 50 μm; target-masker delays, ±50 and ±100 ms). Indeed, Braille reading speed correlated significantly and specifically with masking task performance, and in particular with the backward masking decay time constant. We conclude that vibrotactile sensitivity is unchanged but that perceptual processing is accelerated in congenitally blind Braille readers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20980584      PMCID: PMC3449316          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1447-10.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  63 in total

1.  The relationship of the number of Meissner's corpuscles to dermatoglyphic characters and finger size.

Authors:  Y K Dillon; J Haynes; M Henneberg
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Temporal order and processing acuity of visual, auditory, and tactile perception in developmentally dyslexic young adults.

Authors:  M Laasonen; E Service; V Virsu
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  A four-channel analysis of the tactile sensitivity of the fingertip: frequency selectivity, spatial summation, and temporal summation.

Authors:  George A Gescheider; Stanley J Bolanowski; Jennifer V Pope; Ronald T Verrillo
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.111

4.  Vibrotactile forward masking as a function of age.

Authors:  G A Gescheider; A A Valetutti; M C Padula; R T Verrillo
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Vibrotactile amplitude discrimination capacity parallels magnitude changes in somatosensory cortex and follows Weber's Law.

Authors:  E Francisco; V Tannan; Z Zhang; J Holden; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Vibrotactile intensity discrimination measured by three methods.

Authors:  G A Gescheider; S J Bolanowski; R T Verrillo; D J Arpajian; T F Ryan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Vibrotactile masking: temporal integration, persistence, and strengths of representations.

Authors:  P M Evans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-12

8.  Performance of blind and sighted humans on a tactile grating detection task.

Authors:  Daniel Goldreich; Ingrid M Kanics
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-11

9.  Decay in the effect of vibrotactile masking.

Authors:  J C Makous; G A Gescheider; S J Bolanowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Detection thresholds for stimuli in humans and monkeys: comparison with threshold events in mechanoreceptive afferent nerve fibers innervating the monkey hand.

Authors:  V B Mountcastle; R H LaMotte; G Carli
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  10 in total

1.  Characterization of sex-based differences in the mechanical properties of human finger glabrous tissue using a fiberoptic sensor.

Authors:  Lalit Venkatesan; Steven M Barlow
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold changes after a placebo procedure.

Authors:  Mirta Fiorio; Mehran Emadi Andani; Serena Recchia; Michele Tinazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Alterations in cortical and thalamic connections of somatosensory cortex following early loss of vision.

Authors:  James C Dooley; Leah A Krubitzer
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2018-12-09       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Masking of sounds by a background noise--cochlear mechanical correlates.

Authors:  Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Nigel P Cooper
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Short-term visual deprivation does not enhance passive tactile spatial acuity.

Authors:  Michael Wong; Erik Hackeman; Caitlin Hurd; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparing Tactile to Auditory Guidance for Blind Individuals.

Authors:  Arnav Bharadwaj; Saurabh Bhaskar Shaw; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Repetition suppression for speech processing in the associative occipital and parietal cortex of congenitally blind adults.

Authors:  Laureline Arnaud; Marc Sato; Lucie Ménard; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The effects of negative emotions on sensory perception: fear but not anger decreases tactile sensitivity.

Authors:  Nicholas J Kelley; Brandon J Schmeichel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-22

9.  Braille in the Sighted: Teaching Tactile Reading to Sighted Adults.

Authors:  Łukasz Bola; Katarzyna Siuda-Krzywicka; Małgorzata Paplińska; Ewa Sumera; Paweł Hańczur; Marcin Szwed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Superior non-specific motor learning in the blind.

Authors:  Florence Morin-Parent; Louis de Beaumont; Hugo Théoret; Jean-Francois Lepage
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.