Literature DB >> 22990291

Effect of percutaneous stimulation at different spinal levels on the activation of sensory and motor roots.

François D Roy1, Grady Gibson, Richard B Stein.   

Abstract

Percutaneous spinal stimulation is a promising new technique for understanding human spinal reflexes and for evaluating the pathophysiology of motor roots. Previous studies have generally stimulated the T11/T12 or T12/L1 vertebral junctions, sites that overlie the lumbosacral enlargement. The present study sought to determine the best location for targeting sensory and motor roots during sitting. We used paired stimuli, 50 ms apart, to distinguish the contribution of the reflex and motor components which make up the root evoked potential. This assumed that post-stimulation attenuation, primarily through homosynaptic depression, would abolish the second potential if it was trans-synaptic in origin. Conversely, successive responses would be unchanged if motor roots were being stimulated. Here, we show that sensory root reflexes were optimally elicited with percutaneous stimulation over the L1-L3 vertebrae. However, the optimal position varied between subjects and depended on the target muscle being studied. A collision test showed that the reflex recorded in pre-tibial flexors was low in amplitude and was prone to crosstalk from neighbouring muscles. In contrast to the reflex response, direct motor root activation was optimal with stimulation over the more caudal L5-S1 vertebrae. The present results support the utility of paired stimulation for evaluating the topographical recruitment of sensory and motor roots to human leg muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22990291     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3258-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  23 in total

1.  Spinal cord stimulation facilitates functional walking in a chronic, incomplete spinal cord injured.

Authors:  R Herman; J He; S D'Luzansky; W Willis; S Dilli
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Stepping-like movements in humans with complete spinal cord injury induced by epidural stimulation of the lumbar cord: electromyographic study of compound muscle action potentials.

Authors:  K Minassian; B Jilge; F Rattay; M M Pinter; H Binder; F Gerstenbrand; M R Dimitrijevic
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Effect of epidural stimulation of the lumbosacral spinal cord on voluntary movement, standing, and assisted stepping after motor complete paraplegia: a case study.

Authors:  Susan Harkema; Yury Gerasimenko; Jonathan Hodes; Joel Burdick; Claudia Angeli; Yangsheng Chen; Christie Ferreira; Andrea Willhite; Enrico Rejc; Robert G Grossman; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Scope of a technique for electrical stimulation of human brain, spinal cord, and muscle.

Authors:  P A Merton; D K Hill; H B Morton; C D Marsden
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1982-09-11       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Percutaneous electrical stimulation of lumbosacral roots in man.

Authors:  A Maertens de Noordhout; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; B L Day; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Stimulation of the human lumbar spinal cord with implanted and surface electrodes: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  Josef Ladenbauer; Karen Minassian; Ursula S Hofstoetter; Milan R Dimitrijevic; Frank Rattay
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Magnetic stimulation of the lumbosacral vertebral column in children: normal values and possible sites of stimulation.

Authors:  Y Maegaki; Y Maeoka; K Takeshita
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-04

8.  Antidromic corticospinal tract potential of the brain.

Authors:  J Partanen; J Merikanto; H Kokki; R Kilpeläinen; A Koistinen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Modulation of multisegmental monosynaptic responses in a variety of leg muscles during walking and running in humans.

Authors:  Grégoire Courtine; Susan J Harkema; Christine J Dy; Yuri P Gerasimenko; Poul Dyhre-Poulsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Can the human lumbar posterior columns be stimulated by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation? A modeling study.

Authors:  Simon M Danner; Ursula S Hofstoetter; Josef Ladenbauer; Frank Rattay; Karen Minassian
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.094

View more
  29 in total

1.  Modification of spasticity by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Ursula S Hofstoetter; William B McKay; Keith E Tansey; Winfried Mayr; Helmut Kern; Karen Minassian
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Reduced postactivation depression of soleus H reflex and root evoked potential after transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Jennifer C Andrews; Richard B Stein; François D Roy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Remote muscle contraction enhances spinal reflexes in multiple lower-limb muscles elicited by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Yohei Masugi; Atsushi Sasaki; Naotsugu Kaneko; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Comparison of systemic and localized carrier-mediated delivery of methylprednisolone succinate for treatment of acute spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Maxim E Baltin; Diana E Sabirova; Elvira I Kiseleva; Marat I Kamalov; Timur I Abdullin; Natalia V Petrova; Nafis F Ahmetov; Oscar A Sachenkov; Tatiana V Baltina; Igor A Lavrov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Short-term inhibition of spinal reflexes in multiple lower limb muscles after neuromuscular electrical stimulation of ankle plantar flexors.

Authors:  Matija Milosevic; Yohei Masugi; Hiroki Obata; Atsushi Sasaki; Milos R Popovic; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Spinal segment-specific transcutaneous stimulation differentially shapes activation pattern among motor pools in humans.

Authors:  Dimitry G Sayenko; Darryn A Atkinson; Christine J Dy; Katelyn M Gurley; Valerie L Smith; Claudia Angeli; Susan J Harkema; V Reggie Edgerton; Yury P Gerasimenko
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-03-26

7.  Similarities and differences in cervical and thoracolumbar multisegmental motor responses and the combined use for testing spinal circuitries.

Authors:  Mohamed A Sabbahi; Selda Uzun; Fikriye Ovak Bittar; Yesim Sengul
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Interaction of transcutaneous spinal stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation in human leg muscles.

Authors:  François D Roy; Dillen Bosgra; Richard B Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Transspinal constant-current long-lasting stimulation: a new method to induce cortical and corticospinal plasticity.

Authors:  Maria Knikou; Luke Dixon; Danielle Santora; Mohamed M Ibrahim
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Noninvasive Reactivation of Motor Descending Control after Paralysis.

Authors:  Yury P Gerasimenko; Daniel C Lu; Morteza Modaber; Sharon Zdunowski; Parag Gad; Dimitry G Sayenko; Erika Morikawa; Piia Haakana; Adam R Ferguson; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.