Literature DB >> 22987618

Bias correction to secondary trait analysis with case-control design.

Hua Yun Chen1, Rick Kittles, Wei Zhang.   

Abstract

In genetic association studies with densely typed genetic markers, it is often of substantial interest to examine not only the primary phenotype but also the secondary traits for their association with the genetic markers. For more efficient sample ascertainment of the primary phenotype, a case-control design or its variants, such as the extreme-value sampling design for a quantitative trait, are often adopted. The secondary trait analysis without correcting for the sample ascertainment may yield a biased association estimator. We propose a new method aiming at correcting the potential bias due to the inadequate adjustment of the sample ascertainment. The method yields explicit correction formulas that can be used to both screen the genetic markers and rapidly evaluate the sensitivity of the results to the assumed baseline case-prevalence rate in the population. Simulation studies demonstrate good performance of the proposed approach in comparison with the more computationally intensive approaches, such as the compensator approaches and the maximum prospective likelihood approach. We illustrate the application of the approach by analysis of the genetic association of prostate specific antigen in a case-control study of prostate cancer in the African American population.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22987618      PMCID: PMC4006579          DOI: 10.1002/sim.5613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  18 in total

1.  Genomic control for association studies.

Authors:  B Devlin; K Roeder
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Compatibility of conditionally specified models.

Authors:  Hua Yun Chen
Journal:  Stat Probab Lett       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 0.870

3.  Secondary analysis of case-control data.

Authors:  Yannan Jiang; Alastair J Scott; Chris J Wild
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Re-use of case-control data for analysis of new outcome variables.

Authors:  Marie Reilly; Anna Torrång; Asa Klint
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Analyses of genome-wide association scans for additional outcomes.

Authors:  Peter Kraft
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Analyses of case-control data for additional outcomes.

Authors:  David B Richardson; Peter Rzehak; Jochen Klenk; Stephan K Weiland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Logistic regression in case-control studies: the effect of using independent as dependent variables.

Authors:  N J Nagelkerke; S Moses; F A Plummer; R C Brunham; D Fish
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Using cases to strengthen inference on the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and a secondary phenotype in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Huilin Li; Mitchell H Gail; Sonja Berndt; Nilanjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  Estimation of odds ratios of genetic variants for the secondary phenotypes associated with primary diseases.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Sanjay Shete
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  Prevalence of prostate cancer among men with a prostate-specific antigen level < or =4.0 ng per milliliter.

Authors:  Ian M Thompson; Donna K Pauler; Phyllis J Goodman; Catherine M Tangen; M Scott Lucia; Howard L Parnes; Lori M Minasian; Leslie G Ford; Scott M Lippman; E David Crawford; John J Crowley; Charles A Coltman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  4 in total

1.  A general regression framework for a secondary outcome in case-control studies.

Authors:  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  CONTROL FUNCTION ASSISTED IPW ESTIMATION WITH A SECONDARY OUTCOME IN CASE-CONTROL STUDIES.

Authors:  Tamar Sofer; Marilyn C Cornelis; Peter Kraft; Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.261

3.  A cautionary note on using secondary phenotypes in neuroimaging genetic studies.

Authors:  Junghi Kim; Wei Pan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Evaluation of matched control algorithms in EHR-based phenotyping studies: a case study of inflammatory bowel disease comorbidities.

Authors:  Victor M Castro; W Kay Apperson; Vivian S Gainer; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Alyssa P Goodson; Taowei D Wang; Christopher D Herrick; Shawn N Murphy
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 6.317

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.