Literature DB >> 16320270

Re-use of case-control data for analysis of new outcome variables.

Marie Reilly1, Anna Torrång, Asa Klint.   

Abstract

Case-control studies are usually defined to investigate risk factors for a single disease of interest. However, subsequent to data collection, investigators may wish to examine as an 'outcome' a variable that was an exposure in the original study. A naive analysis that disregards the sampling strategy that gave rise to the data is clearly prone to bias. We present here a simple approach to the analysis of such data using an appropriately weighted regression model. Viewing the problem as a two-stage design provides a unified framework for recognizing and defining the necessary weights when confronted with a variety of real data problems that at first seem unrelated. We provide illustrations that highlight the generality of the approach and demonstrate that the method gives essentially the same results as more specialized methods that require non-standard tools for analysis. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16320270     DOI: 10.1002/sim.2398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  A general regression framework for a secondary outcome in case-control studies.

Authors:  Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  Multimodal nociceptive mechanisms underlying chronic pelvic pain.

Authors:  Kevin M Hellman; Insiyyah Y Patanwala; Kristen E Pozolo; Frank F Tu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Higher biomarker-calibrated protein intake is not associated with impaired renal function in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Jeannette M Beasley; Aaron K Aragaki; Andrea Z LaCroix; Marian L Neuhouser; Lesley F Tinker; Jane A Cauley; Kristine E Ensrud; Rebecca D Jackson; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Logistic regression with a continuous exposure measured in pools and subject to errors.

Authors:  Dane R Van Domelen; Emily M Mitchell; Neil J Perkins; Enrique F Schisterman; Amita K Manatunga; Yijian Huang; Robert H Lyles
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Estimating risk ratio from any standard epidemiological design by doubling the cases.

Authors:  Yilin Ning; Anastasia Lam; Marie Reilly
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.612

6.  Bias correction to secondary trait analysis with case-control design.

Authors:  Hua Yun Chen; Rick Kittles; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Case/control studies with follow-up: Constructing the source population to estimate effects of risk factors on development, disease, and survival.

Authors:  Halvor Sommerfelt; Hans Steinsland; Lize van der Merwe; William C Blackwelder; Dilruba Nasrin; Tamer H Farag; Karen L Kotloff; Myron M Levine; Håkon K Gjessing
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Frequency and risk indicators of tooth decay among pregnant women in France: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Noel Vergnes; Monique Kaminski; Nathalie Lelong; Anne-Marie Musset; Michel Sixou; Cathy Nabet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Feasibility and Accuracy of a Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing Instrument to Ascertain Prior Immunization With Human Papillomavirus Vaccine by Self-Report: Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Carlos R Oliveira; Lital Avni-Singer; Geovanna Badaro; Erin L Sullivan; Sangini S Sheth; Eugene D Shapiro; Linda M Niccolai
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2020-01-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.