Literature DB >> 22977149

Mutualism and evolutionary multiplayer games: revisiting the Red King.

Chaitanya S Gokhale1, Arne Traulsen.   

Abstract

Coevolution of two species is typically thought to favour the evolution of faster evolutionary rates helping a species keep ahead in the Red Queen race, where 'it takes all the running you can do to stay where you are'. In contrast, if species are in a mutualistic relationship, it was proposed that the Red King effect may act, where it can be beneficial to evolve slower than the mutualistic species. The Red King hypothesis proposes that the species which evolves slower can gain a larger share of the benefits. However, the interactions between the two species may involve multiple individuals. To analyse such a situation, we resort to evolutionary multiplayer games. Even in situations where evolving slower is beneficial in a two-player setting, faster evolution may be favoured in a multiplayer setting. The underlying features of multiplayer games can be crucial for the distribution of benefits. They also suggest a link between the evolution of the rate of evolution and group size.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22977149      PMCID: PMC3479726          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.1697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  30 in total

1.  The Red King effect: when the slowest runner wins the coevolutionary race.

Authors:  Carl T Bergstrom; Michael Lachmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism.

Authors:  E Toby Kiers; Robert A Rousseau; Stuart A West; R Ford Denison
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Ecological persistence of the plant-mycorrhizal mutualism: a hypothesis from species coexistence theory.

Authors:  Jason D Hoeksema; Miroslav Kummel
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Effective leadership and decision-making in animal groups on the move.

Authors:  Iain D Couzin; Jens Krause; Nigel R Franks; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-02-03       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Evolutionary games and population dynamics: maintenance of cooperation in public goods games.

Authors:  Christoph Hauert; Miranda Holmes; Michael Doebeli
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Evolution of cooperation under N-person snowdrift games.

Authors:  Max O Souza; Jorge M Pacheco; Francisco C Santos
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  The evolution of interspecific mutualisms.

Authors:  M Doebeli; N Knowlton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Arms races between and within species.

Authors:  R Dawkins; J R Krebs
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

9.  Cleaning symbiosis as an evolutionary game: To cheat or not to cheat?

Authors: 
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1995-07-07       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Understanding animal group-size distributions.

Authors:  Michael Griesser; Qi Ma; Simone Webber; Katharine Bowgen; David J T Sumpter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Red Queen and King in finite populations.

Authors:  Carl Veller; Laura K Hayward; Christian Hilbe; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The extended phenotypes of marine symbioses: ecological and evolutionary consequences of intraspecific genetic diversity in coral-algal associations.

Authors:  John E Parkinson; Iliana B Baums
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Biofilm growth mode promotes maximum carrying capacity and community stability during product inhibition syntrophy.

Authors:  Kristen A Brileya; Laura B Camilleri; Grant M Zane; Judy D Wall; Matthew W Fields
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  The shift between the Red Queen and the Red King effects in mutualisms.

Authors:  Lei Gao; Yao-Tang Li; Rui-Wu Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Should we hail the Red King? Evolutionary consequences of a mutualistic lifestyle in genomes of lichenized ascomycetes.

Authors:  Claudio G Ametrano; H Thorsten Lumbsch; Isabel Di Stefano; Ek Sangvichien; Lucia Muggia; Felix Grewe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Collective punishment is more effective than collective reward for promoting cooperation.

Authors:  Lei Gao; Zhen Wang; Riccardo Pansini; Yao-Tang Li; Rui-Wu Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Partners or rivals? Strategies for the iterated prisoner's dilemma.

Authors:  Christian Hilbe; Arne Traulsen; Karl Sigmund
Journal:  Games Econ Behav       Date:  2015-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.