Literature DB >> 12955144

Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism.

E Toby Kiers1, Robert A Rousseau, Stuart A West, R Ford Denison.   

Abstract

Explaining mutualistic cooperation between species remains one of the greatest problems for evolutionary biology. Why do symbionts provide costly services to a host, indirectly benefiting competitors sharing the same individual host? Host monitoring of symbiont performance and the imposition of sanctions on 'cheats' could stabilize mutualism. Here we show that soybeans penalize rhizobia that fail to fix N(2) inside their root nodules. We prevented a normally mutualistic rhizobium strain from cooperating (fixing N(2)) by replacing air with an N(2)-free atmosphere (Ar:O(2)). A series of experiments at three spatial scales (whole plants, half root systems and individual nodules) demonstrated that forcing non-cooperation (analogous to cheating) decreased the reproductive success of rhizobia by about 50%. Non-invasive monitoring implicated decreased O(2) supply as a possible mechanism for sanctions against cheating rhizobia. More generally, such sanctions by one or both partners may be important in stabilizing a wide range of mutualistic symbioses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12955144     DOI: 10.1038/nature01931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  201 in total

1.  Oviposition strategies, host coercion and the stable exploitation of figs by wasps.

Authors:  Douglas W Yu; Jo Ridley; Emmanuelle Jousselin; Edward Allen Herre; Stephen G Compton; James M Cook; Jamie C Moore; George D Weiblen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Synergy of multiple partners, including freeloaders, increases host fitness in a multispecies mutualism.

Authors:  Todd M Palmer; Daniel F Doak; Maureen L Stanton; Judith L Bronstein; E Toby Kiers; Truman P Young; Jacob R Goheen; Robert M Pringle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Economic contract theory tests models of mutualism.

Authors:  E Glen Weyl; Megan E Frederickson; Douglas W Yu; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Cooperation for direct fitness benefits.

Authors:  Olof Leimar; Peter Hammerstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The interplay of cognition and cooperation.

Authors:  Sarah F Brosnan; Lucie Salwiczek; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Variation and the response to variation as a basis for successful cooperation.

Authors:  John M McNamara; Olof Leimar
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  An ancient but promiscuous host-symbiont association between Burkholderia gut symbionts and their heteropteran hosts.

Authors:  Yoshitomo Kikuchi; Takahiro Hosokawa; Takema Fukatsu
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 8.  Microbial population and community dynamics on plant roots and their feedbacks on plant communities.

Authors:  James D Bever; Thomas G Platt; Elise R Morton
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 15.500

9.  Host discrimination in modular mutualisms: a theoretical framework for meta-populations of mutualists and exploiters.

Authors:  Brian S Steidinger; James D Bever
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Functional differences of two distinct catalases in Mesorhizobium loti MAFF303099 under free-living and symbiotic conditions.

Authors:  Masaki Hanyu; Hanae Fujimoto; Kouhei Tejima; Kazuhiko Saeki
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.