Literature DB >> 12525707

The Red King effect: when the slowest runner wins the coevolutionary race.

Carl T Bergstrom1, Michael Lachmann.   

Abstract

Mutualisms provide benefits to those who participate in them. As a mutualism evolves, how will these benefits come to be allocated among the participants? We approach this question by using evolutionary game theory and explore the ways in which the coevolutionary process determines the allocation of benefits in mutualistic interactions. Motivated by the Red Queen theory, which states that coevolutionary processes favor rapid rates of evolution, we pay particular attention to the role of evolutionary rates in the establishment of mutualism and the partitioning of benefits among mutualist partners. We find that, contrary to the Red Queen, in mutualism evolution the slowly evolving species is likely to gain a disproportionate share of the benefits. Moreover, population structure serves to magnify the advantage to the slower species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12525707      PMCID: PMC141041          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0134966100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  12 in total

1.  The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Induced indirect defence in a lycaenid-ant association: the regulation of a resource in a mutualism.

Authors:  A A Agrawal; J A Fordyce
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Reward and punishment.

Authors:  K Sigmund; C Hauert; M A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sanctions and mutualism stability: why do rhizobia fix nitrogen?

Authors:  Stuart A West; E Toby Kiers; Ellen L Simms; R Ford Denison
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Pharmaceuticals and the developing world.

Authors:  Michael Kremer
Journal:  J Econ Perspect       Date:  2002

6.  On the founder effect and the evolution of altruistic traits.

Authors:  D Cohen; I Eshel
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment.

Authors:  G Roberts; T N Sherratt
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-07-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The evolution of interspecific mutualisms.

Authors:  M Doebeli; N Knowlton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Evolutionary dynamics for bimatrix games: a Hamiltonian system?

Authors:  J Hofbauer
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.259

10.  Arms races between and within species.

Authors:  R Dawkins; J R Krebs
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21
View more
  30 in total

1.  Evolutionary stability of mutualism: interspecific population regulation as an evolutionarily stable strategy.

Authors:  J Nathaniel Holland; Donald L DeAngelis; Stewart T Schultz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Why mutual helping in most natural systems is neither conflict-free nor based on maximal conflict.

Authors:  Redouan Bshary; Klaus Zuberbühler; Carel P van Schaik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Using artificial systems to explore the ecology and evolution of symbioses.

Authors:  Babak Momeni; Chi-Chun Chen; Kristina L Hillesland; Adam Waite; Wenying Shou
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  The Red Queen and King in finite populations.

Authors:  Carl Veller; Laura K Hayward; Christian Hilbe; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ecological specialization is associated with genetic structure in the ant-associated butterfly family Lycaenidae.

Authors:  Sämi Schär; Rodney Eastwood; Kimberly G Arnaldi; Gerard Talavera; Zofia A Kaliszewska; John H Boyle; Marianne Espeland; David R Nash; Roger Vila; Naomi E Pierce
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Mutualism and evolutionary multiplayer games: revisiting the Red King.

Authors:  Chaitanya S Gokhale; Arne Traulsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Evolution of flexibility and rigidity in retaliatory punishment.

Authors:  Adam Morris; James MacGlashan; Michael L Littman; Fiery Cushman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A slowly evolving host moves first in symbiotic interactions.

Authors:  James A Damore; Jeff Gore
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Selection for protection in an ant-plant mutualism: host sanctions, host modularity, and the principal-agent game.

Authors:  David P Edwards; Mark Hassall; William J Sutherland; Douglas W Yu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Small genome of the fungus Escovopsis weberi, a specialized disease agent of ant agriculture.

Authors:  Tom J B de Man; Jason E Stajich; Christian P Kubicek; Clotilde Teiling; Komal Chenthamara; Lea Atanasova; Irina S Druzhinina; Natasha Levenkova; Stephanie S L Birnbaum; Seth M Barribeau; Brooke A Bozick; Garret Suen; Cameron R Currie; Nicole M Gerardo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.