Literature DB >> 28630336

The Red Queen and King in finite populations.

Carl Veller1,2, Laura K Hayward3, Christian Hilbe4, Martin A Nowak5,2,6.   

Abstract

In antagonistic symbioses, such as host-parasite interactions, one population's success is the other's loss. In mutualistic symbioses, such as division of labor, both parties can gain, but they might have different preferences over the possible mutualistic arrangements. The rates of evolution of the two populations in a symbiosis are important determinants of which population will be more successful: Faster evolution is thought to be favored in antagonistic symbioses (the "Red Queen effect"), but disfavored in certain mutualistic symbioses (the "Red King effect"). However, it remains unclear which biological parameters drive these effects. Here, we analyze the effects of the various determinants of evolutionary rate: generation time, mutation rate, population size, and the intensity of natural selection. Our main results hold for the case where mutation is infrequent. Slower evolution causes a long-term advantage in an important class of mutualistic interactions. Surprisingly, less intense selection is the strongest driver of this Red King effect, whereas relative mutation rates and generation times have little effect. In antagonistic interactions, faster evolution by any means is beneficial. Our results provide insight into the demographic evolution of symbionts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Müllerian mimicry; antagonism; mutualism; rate of evolution; symbiosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28630336      PMCID: PMC5502615          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702020114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  71 in total

Review 1.  Conflict begets complexity: the evolution of centromeres.

Authors:  Harmit S Malik; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 2.  The evolution of mutualism.

Authors:  E G Leigh
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.411

3.  Genetic scrambling as a defence against meiotic drive.

Authors:  D Haig; A Grafen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1991-12-21       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Stochastic evolutionary dynamics of bimatrix games.

Authors:  Hisashi Ohtsuki
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game.

Authors:  David G Rand; Corina E Tarnita; Hisashi Ohtsuki; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Evolution of the mutation rate.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Assortment and the evolution of cooperation in a Moran process with exponential fitness.

Authors:  Daniel Cooney; Benjamin Allen; Carl Veller
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Arms races between and within species.

Authors:  R Dawkins; J R Krebs
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

Review 9.  The evolution of Müllerian mimicry.

Authors:  Thomas N Sherratt
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2008-06-10

10.  Recombination regulator PRDM9 influences the instability of its own coding sequence in humans.

Authors:  Alec J Jeffreys; Victoria E Cotton; Rita Neumann; Kwan-Wood Gabriel Lam
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

1.  α-Rank: Multi-Agent Evaluation by Evolution.

Authors:  Shayegan Omidshafiei; Christos Papadimitriou; Georgios Piliouras; Karl Tuyls; Mark Rowland; Jean-Baptiste Lespiau; Wojciech M Czarnecki; Marc Lanctot; Julien Perolat; Remi Munos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Divergent paths in the evolutionary history of maternally transmitted clam symbionts.

Authors:  Maëva Perez; Corinna Breusing; Bernard Angers; Roxanne A Beinart; Yong-Jin Won; C Robert Young
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  How long do Red Queen dynamics survive under genetic drift? A comparative analysis of evolutionary and eco-evolutionary models.

Authors:  Hanna Schenk; Hinrich Schulenburg; Arne Traulsen
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.260

Review 4.  Microbial evolution and transitions along the parasite-mutualist continuum.

Authors:  Georgia C Drew; Emily J Stevens; Kayla C King
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 78.297

5.  Should we hail the Red King? Evolutionary consequences of a mutualistic lifestyle in genomes of lichenized ascomycetes.

Authors:  Claudio G Ametrano; H Thorsten Lumbsch; Isabel Di Stefano; Ek Sangvichien; Lucia Muggia; Felix Grewe
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Eco-evolutionary Red Queen dynamics regulate biodiversity in a metabolite-driven microbial system.

Authors:  Juan A Bonachela; Meike T Wortel; Nils Chr Stenseth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Social Closure and the Evolution of Cooperation via Indirect Reciprocity.

Authors:  Simone Righi; Károly Takács
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.