Literature DB >> 22977069

On the evolution of noise-dependent vocal plasticity in birds.

Sophie Schuster1, Sue Anne Zollinger, John A Lesku, Henrik Brumm.   

Abstract

Signal plasticity is considered an important step in the evolution of animal communication. In acoustic communication, signal transmission is often constrained by background noise. One adaptation to evade acoustic signal masking is the Lombard effect, in which an animal increases its vocal amplitude in response to an increase in background noise. This form of signal plasticity has been found in mammals, including humans, and some birds, but not frogs. However, the evolution of the Lombard effect is still unclear. Here we demonstrate for the first time the Lombard effect in a phylogentically basal bird species, the tinamou Eudromia elegans. By doing so, we take a step towards reconstructing the evolutionary history of noise-dependent vocal plasticity in birds. Similar to humans, the tinamous also raised their vocal pitch in noise, irrespective of any release from signal masking. The occurrence of the Lombard effect in a basal bird group suggests that this form of vocal plasticity was present in the common ancestor of all living birds and thus evolved at least as early as 119 Ma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22977069      PMCID: PMC3497139          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  16 in total

1.  Are low-frequency songs sexually selected, and do they lose their potency in male-female interactions under noisy conditions?

Authors:  Marcel Eens; Hector Fabio Rivera-Gutierrez; Rianne Pinxten
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Adaptation and plasticity of animal communication in fluctuating environments.

Authors:  Terry J Ord; Judy A Stamps; Jonathan B Losos
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Experimental evidence for real-time song frequency shift in response to urban noise in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Eira Bermúdez-Cuamatzin; Alejandro A Ríos-Chelén; Diego Gil; Constantino Macías Garcia
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and syllable rate of songs and calls in silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis).

Authors:  Dominique A Potvin; Kirsten M Parris; Raoul A Mulder
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history.

Authors:  Shannon J Hackett; Rebecca T Kimball; Sushma Reddy; Rauri C K Bowie; Edward L Braun; Michael J Braun; Jena L Chojnowski; W Andrew Cox; Kin-Lan Han; John Harshman; Christopher J Huddleston; Ben D Marks; Kathleen J Miglia; William S Moore; Frederick H Sheldon; David W Steadman; Christopher C Witt; Tamaki Yuri
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Sound source perception in anuran amphibians.

Authors:  Mark A Bee
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Sander Bot; Jasper Buikx; Marco van der Velde; Jan Komdeur; Carel ten Cate; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Audio-vocal interaction in the pontine brainstem during self-initiated vocalization in the squirrel monkey.

Authors:  Steffen R Hage; Uwe Jürgens; Günter Ehret
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Birds and anthropogenic noise: are urban songs adaptive?

Authors:  Erwin Nemeth; Henrik Brumm
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Effects of urban noise on song and response behaviour in great tits.

Authors:  Emily J Mockford; Rupert C Marshall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  11 in total

1.  Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Steffen R Hage; Tinglei Jiang; Sean W Berquist; Jiang Feng; Walter Metzner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Vocal plasticity in a reptile.

Authors:  Henrik Brumm; Sue Anne Zollinger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Higher songs of city birds may not be an individual response to noise.

Authors:  Sue Anne Zollinger; Peter J B Slater; Erwin Nemeth; Henrik Brumm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Bird song and anthropogenic noise: vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities.

Authors:  Erwin Nemeth; Nadia Pieretti; Sue Anne Zollinger; Nicole Geberzahn; Jesko Partecke; Ana Catarina Miranda; Henrik Brumm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  White-crowned sparrow males show immediate flexibility in song amplitude but not in song minimum frequency in response to changes in noise levels in the field.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Derryberry; Katherine Gentry; Graham E Derryberry; Jennifer N Phillips; Raymond M Danner; Julie E Danner; David A Luther
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Potential effects of anthropogenic noise on echolocation behavior in horseshoe bats.

Authors:  Steffen R Hage; Walter Metzner
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2013-05-10

7.  The Lombard effect in male ultrasonic frogs: Regulating antiphonal signal frequency and amplitude in noise.

Authors:  Jun-Xian Shen; Zhi-Min Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Moderate evidence for a Lombard effect in a phylogenetically basal primate.

Authors:  Christian Schopf; Sabine Schmidt; Elke Zimmermann
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Universal mechanisms of sound production and control in birds and mammals.

Authors:  C P H Elemans; J H Rasmussen; C T Herbst; D N Düring; S A Zollinger; H Brumm; K Srivastava; N Svane; M Ding; O N Larsen; S J Sober; J G Švec
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Short- and mid-wavelength artificial light influences the flash signals of Aquatica ficta fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae).

Authors:  Avalon Celeste Stevahn Owens; Victor Benno Meyer-Rochow; En-Cheng Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.