Literature DB >> 22975113

Embryo incubation and selection in a time-lapse monitoring system improves pregnancy outcome compared with a standard incubator: a retrospective cohort study.

Marcos Meseguer1, Irene Rubio, Maria Cruz, Natalia Basile, Julian Marcos, Antonio Requena.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effect on reproductive outcome of culturing and selecting embryos using a novel time-lapse monitoring system (TMS).
DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study.
SETTING: University-affiliated private center. PATIENT(S): Donation and autologous intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles from ten IVF clinics using similar procedures, cultured in TMS (n = 1,390) or in a standard incubator (SI; n = 5,915). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate confirmed by ultrasound in week 7. RESULT(S): A logistic regression analysis, which included all significant confounding factors, was used to evaluate the effect of culturing and selecting embryos with the use of TMS. Comparing clinical pregnancy rates per oocyte retrieval with TMS and SI treatments gave a crude effect of odds ratio [OR] 1.190 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.058-1.337). Oocyte source, maternal age, day of transfer, and number of retrieved oocytes were identified as significant confounding factors. After accounting for confounding factors, the effect of TMS culture was OR 1.201 (95% CI 1.059-1.363). Limiting analysis to treatments with embryo transfer and including number of transferred embryos as a confounding factor likewise gave a significant effect of TMS with OR 1.157 (95% CI 1.018-1.315). CONCLUSION(S): Analysis of retrospective data indicated that culturing and selecting embryos by TMS significantly improved the relative probability of clinical pregnancy (+20.1% per oocyte retrieval, +15.7% per embryo transfer). The elevated clinical pregnancy rate was attributed to a combination of stable culture conditions and the use of morphokinetic parameters for embryo selection.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22975113     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  66 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) following day 3 single cell blastomere biopsy markedly improves IVF outcomes while lowering multiple pregnancies and miscarriages.

Authors:  Martin D Keltz; Mario Vega; Ido Sirota; Matthew Lederman; Erin L Moshier; Eric Gonzales; Daniel Stein
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Reproducibility of a time-lapse embryo selection model based on morphokinetic data in a sequential culture media setting.

Authors:  Ender Yalçınkaya; Elif G Ergin; Eray Calışkan; Zeynep Oztel; Alev Ozay; Hakan Ozörnek
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2014-08-08

3.  Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Sarah Armstrong; Priya Bhide; Vanessa Jordan; Allan Pacey; Jane Marjoribanks; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-29

4.  National survey on use of time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories.

Authors:  Andrey V Dolinko; L V Farland; D J Kaser; S A Missmer; C Racowsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Blastomere biopsy for PGD delays embryo compaction and blastulation: a time-lapse microscopic analysis.

Authors:  Liron Bar-El; Yael Kalma; Mira Malcov; Tamar Schwartz; Shaul Raviv; Tania Cohen; Hadar Amir; Yoni Cohen; Adi Reches; Ami Amit; Dalit Ben-Yosef
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Early compaction at day 3 may be a useful additional criterion for embryo transfer.

Authors:  Sébastien Le Cruguel; Véronique Ferré-L'Hôtellier; Catherine Morinière; Sophie Lemerle; Pascal Reynier; Philippe Descamps; Pascale May-Panloup
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  A comparison of morphokinetic markers predicting blastocyst formation and implantation potential from two large clinical data sets.

Authors:  N Zaninovic; M Nohales; Q Zhan; Z M J de Los Santos; J Sierra; Z Rosenwaks; M Meseguer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Correlation between morphokinetic parameters and standard morphological assessment: what can we predict from early embryo development? A time-lapse-based experiment with 2085 blastocysts.

Authors:  Catherine Jacobs; Mariana Nicolielo; Renata Erberelli; Fabiana Mendez; Marina Fanelli; Livia Cremonesi; Beatriz Aiello; Aline R Lorenzon
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-07-14

Review 9.  Biomarkers identified with time-lapse imaging: discovery, validation, and practical application.

Authors:  Alice A Chen; Lei Tan; Vaishali Suraj; Renee Reijo Pera; Shehua Shen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Assessing morphokinetic parameters via time lapse microscopy (TLM) to predict euploidy: are aneuploidy risk classification models universal?

Authors:  Yael G Kramer; Jason D Kofinas; Katherine Melzer; Nicole Noyes; Caroline McCaffrey; Julia Buldo-Licciardi; David H McCulloh; James A Grifo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.