Literature DB >> 25317043

Reproducibility of a time-lapse embryo selection model based on morphokinetic data in a sequential culture media setting.

Ender Yalçınkaya1, Elif G Ergin1, Eray Calışkan1, Zeynep Oztel1, Alev Ozay1, Hakan Ozörnek1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of embryos that were given a dynamic score based on a preconstructed embryo scoring model and to analyze whether this model complies with our data.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 910 transferred embryos with known implantation data were retrospectively analyzed in this study. All of the embryos were given a dynamic score based on the preconstructed hierarchical embryo scoring model.
RESULTS: The highest pregnancy rate was seen in groups C+ and A- (48.2% for each), and the lowest was observed in Group E (19.7%). When implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were compared between groups, it was found that the highest and statistically significant implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were seen in group C+ (32.7% for each, p=0.000). They were dropped down to 29.4% in Group A-.
CONCLUSION: The outcomes of the embryos based on the dynamic score do not comply with the results of the preconstructed model. Each IVF laboratory is unique based on its practice. Therefore, we suggest that each IVF laboratory should determine its own embryo selection criteria based on its own data instead of using a preconstructed model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Preconstructed model; dynamic score; pregnancy rate

Year:  2014        PMID: 25317043      PMCID: PMC4195325          DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2014.13068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc        ISSN: 1309-0380


  19 in total

1.  Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technology: a call for investigation.

Authors:  Emily L Niemitz; Andrew P Feinberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 2.  Noninvasive methods to assess embryo quality.

Authors:  Denny Sakkas; David K Gardner
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Kinetic markers of human embryo quality using time-lapse recordings of IVF/ICSI-fertilized oocytes.

Authors:  J G Lemmen; I Agerholm; S Ziebe
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 4.  Time-lapse microscopy and image analysis in basic and clinical embryo development research.

Authors:  C Wong; A A Chen; B Behr; S Shen
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations.

Authors:  Linda Sundvall; Hans Jakob Ingerslev; Ulla Breth Knudsen; Kirstine Kirkegaard
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Time-lapse evaluation of human embryo development in single versus sequential culture media--a sibling oocyte study.

Authors:  Haydar Nadir Ciray; Turan Aksoy; Cihan Goktas; Bilgen Ozturk; Mustafa Bahceci
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Time-lapse analysis of mouse embryo development in oxygen gradients.

Authors:  P L Wale; D K Gardner
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 3.828

8.  Effect of oxygen concentration on human embryo development evaluated by time-lapse monitoring.

Authors:  Kirstine Kirkegaard; Johnny Juhl Hindkjaer; Hans Jakob Ingerslev
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Type of culture media does not affect embryo kinetics: a time-lapse analysis of sibling oocytes.

Authors:  Natalia Basile; Dean Morbeck; Juan García-Velasco; Fernando Bronet; Marcos Meseguer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 10.  Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception.

Authors:  D A Blake; C M Farquhar; N Johnson; M Proctor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17
View more
  7 in total

1.  Between-laboratory reproducibility of time-lapse embryo selection using qualitative and quantitative parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanhe Liu; Fang Qi; Phillip Matson; Dean E Morbeck; Ben W Mol; Sai Zhao; Masoud Afnan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3.

Authors:  Bjørn Molt Petersen; Mikkel Boel; Markus Montag; David K Gardner
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 3.  Revealing the secret life of pre-implantation embryos by time-lapse monitoring: A review.

Authors:  Azita Faramarzi; Mohammad Ali Khalili; Giulietta Micara; Azam Agha-Rahimi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2017-05

4.  Does time-lapse imaging have favorable results for embryo incubation and selection compared with conventional methods in clinical in vitro fertilization? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Minghao Chen; Shiyou Wei; Junyan Hu; Jing Yuan; Fenghua Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Can novel early non-invasive biomarkers of embryo quality be identified with time-lapse imaging to predict live birth?

Authors:  J Barberet; C Bruno; E Valot; C Antunes-Nunes; L Jonval; J Chammas; C Choux; P Ginod; P Sagot; A Soudry-Faure; P Fauque
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  The KidscoreTM D5 algorithm as an additional tool to morphological assessment and PGT-A in embryo selection: a time-lapse study.

Authors:  Eduardo Gazzo; Fernando Peña; Federico Valdéz; Arturo Chung; Claudio Bonomini; Mario Ascenzo; Marcelo Velit; Ernesto Escudero
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-01-30

7.  External validation of a time-lapse model; a retrospective study comparing embryo evaluation using a morphokinetic model to standard morphology with live birth as endpoint.

Authors:  Emma Adolfsson; Sandra Porath; Anna Nowosad Andershed
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2018-09-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.