PURPOSE: The reduction of the number of embryos transferred while maintaining a satisfactory rate of pregnancy (PR) with in vitro fertilization calls for a refined technique of embryonic selection. This prospective study investigates the significance of early embryonic compaction at day 3 as a marker of the chances of implantation. METHODS: We examined 317 transfers and their outcome involving 509 embryos including 91 compacted embryos. RESULTS: Early compaction seems linked with the ovarian response to stimulation and embryonic quality. The PR is significantly increased when the embryonic cohort contains at least one compacted embryo (44% versus 29.5%, p = 0.01), and when at least one compacted embryo is transferred (44% versus 31%, p < 0.05). The analysis of our single embryo transfers shows that the implantation rates are significantly better for compacted embryos (50% versus 30%, p < 0.05) (OR 2.98; CI 1.02-5.28). CONCLUSION: Thus, early compaction, sometimes observed at day 3, may serve as a useful additional criterion for selecting the embryos transferred.
PURPOSE: The reduction of the number of embryos transferred while maintaining a satisfactory rate of pregnancy (PR) with in vitro fertilization calls for a refined technique of embryonic selection. This prospective study investigates the significance of early embryonic compaction at day 3 as a marker of the chances of implantation. METHODS: We examined 317 transfers and their outcome involving 509 embryos including 91 compacted embryos. RESULTS: Early compaction seems linked with the ovarian response to stimulation and embryonic quality. The PR is significantly increased when the embryonic cohort contains at least one compacted embryo (44% versus 29.5%, p = 0.01), and when at least one compacted embryo is transferred (44% versus 31%, p < 0.05). The analysis of our single embryo transfers shows that the implantation rates are significantly better for compacted embryos (50% versus 30%, p < 0.05) (OR 2.98; CI 1.02-5.28). CONCLUSION: Thus, early compaction, sometimes observed at day 3, may serve as a useful additional criterion for selecting the embryos transferred.
Authors: Béatrice Blondel; Michael D Kogan; Greg R Alexander; Nirupa Dattani; Michael S Kramer; Alison Macfarlane; Shi Wu Wen Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mona M Aboulghar; Mohamed A Aboulghar; Ragaa T Mansour; Gamal I Serour; Yehia M Amin; Ahmed M Abou-Setta Journal: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Date: 2003-04-25 Impact factor: 2.435
Authors: Juan Carlos Fierro-González; Melanie D White; Juan Carlos Silva; Nicolas Plachta Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2013-11-24 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Susanna Apter; Thomas Ebner; Thomas Freour; Yves Guns; Borut Kovacic; Nathalie Le Clef; Monica Marques; Marcos Meseguer; Debbie Montjean; Ioannis Sfontouris; Roger Sturmey; Giovanni Coticchio Journal: Hum Reprod Open Date: 2020-03-19