Literature DB >> 22974974

The cortical dynamics underlying effective switching of auditory spatial attention.

Eric Larson1, Adrian K C Lee.   

Abstract

Successful rapid deployment of attention to relevant sensory stimuli is critical for survival. In a complex environment, attention can be captured by salient events or be deployed volitionally. Furthermore, when multiple events are of interest concurrently, effective interaction with one's surroundings hinges on efficient top-down control of shifting attention. It has been hypothesized that two separate cortical networks coordinate attention shifts across multiple modalities. However, the cortical dynamics of these networks and their behavioral relevance to switching of auditory attention are unknown. Here we show that the strength of each subject's right temporoparietal junction (RTPJ, part of the ventral network) activation was highly correlated with their behavioral performance in an auditory task. We also provide evidence that the recruitment of the RTPJ likely precedes the right frontal eye fields (FEF; participating in both the dorsal and ventral networks) and middle frontal gyrus (MFG) by around 100 ms when subjects switch their auditory spatial attention.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22974974      PMCID: PMC3508251          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  51 in total

1.  Responses to rare visual target and distractor stimuli using event-related fMRI.

Authors:  V P Clark; S Fannon; S Lai; R Benson; L Bauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; John Jonides; Susan Reading
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Neural dynamics of event segmentation in music: converging evidence for dissociable ventral and dorsal networks.

Authors:  Devarajan Sridharan; Daniel J Levitin; Chris H Chafe; Jonathan Berger; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.

Authors:  Dahlia Sharon; Matti S Hämäläinen; Roger B H Tootell; Eric Halgren; John W Belliveau
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Quantification of the benefit from integrating MEG and EEG data in minimum l2-norm estimation.

Authors:  A Molins; S M Stufflebeam; E N Brown; M S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  Mapping cortical dynamics using simultaneous MEG/EEG and anatomically-constrained minimum-norm estimates: an auditory attention example.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Eric Larson; Ross K Maddox
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

9.  The anatomy of visual neglect.

Authors:  Dominic J Mort; Paresh Malhotra; Sabira K Mannan; Chris Rorden; Alidz Pambakian; Chris Kennard; Masud Husain
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2003-06-23       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  FEF TMS affects visual cortical activity.

Authors:  Paul C J Taylor; Anna C Nobre; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-03-08       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  18 in total

1.  Influence of preparation time and pitch separation in switching of auditory attention between streams.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Pupillometry shows the effort of auditory attention switching.

Authors:  Daniel R McCloy; Bonnie K Lau; Eric Larson; Katherine A I Pratt; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Neural Switch Asymmetry in Feature-Based Auditory Attention Tasks.

Authors:  Susan A McLaughlin; Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-23

4.  Towards a next-generation hearing aid through brain state classification and modeling.

Authors:  Mark Wronkiewicz; Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

Review 5.  Using neuroimaging to understand the cortical mechanisms of auditory selective attention.

Authors:  Adrian K C Lee; Eric Larson; Ross K Maddox; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Leveraging anatomical information to improve transfer learning in brain-computer interfaces.

Authors:  Mark Wronkiewicz; Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Switching auditory attention using spatial and non-spatial features recruits different cortical networks.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Dynamic oscillatory processes governing cued orienting and allocation of auditory attention.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Samantha Huang; John W Belliveau; Wei-Tang Chang; Matti Hämäläinen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Lateral prefrontal cortex lesion impairs regulation of internally and externally directed attention.

Authors:  Julia W Y Kam; Anne-Kristin Solbakk; Tor Endestad; Torstein R Meling; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data.

Authors:  Alexandre Gramfort; Martin Luessi; Eric Larson; Denis A Engemann; Daniel Strohmeier; Christian Brodbeck; Lauri Parkkonen; Matti S Hämäläinen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.