Literature DB >> 24110311

Towards a next-generation hearing aid through brain state classification and modeling.

Mark Wronkiewicz, Eric Larson, Adrian K C Lee.   

Abstract

Traditional brain-state classifications are primarily based on two well-known neural biomarkers: P300 and motor imagery / event-related frequency modulation. Currently, many brain-computer interface (BCI) systems have successfully helped patients with severe neuromuscular disabilities to regain independence. In order to translate this neural engineering success to hearing aid applications, we must be able to capture brain waves across the population reliably in cortical regions that have not previously been incorporated in these systems before, for example, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and right temporoparietal junction. Here, we present a brain-state classification framework that incorporates individual anatomical information and accounts for potential anatomical and functional differences across subjects by applying appropriate cortical weighting functions prior to the classification stage. Using an inverse imaging approach, use simulated EEG data to show that our method can outperform the traditional brain-state classification approach that trains only on individual subject's data without considering data available at a population level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24110311      PMCID: PMC5930482          DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6610124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  10 in total

1.  High-resolution intersubject averaging and a coordinate system for the cortical surface.

Authors:  B Fischl; M I Sereno; R B Tootell; A M Dale
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.

Authors:  J C Mosher; R M Leahy; P S Lewis
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Bilateral hearing aids: a review of self-reports of benefit in comparison with unilateral fitting.

Authors:  William Noble
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 4.  Directional hearing aids: then and now.

Authors:  Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

5.  Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data.

Authors:  M S Hämäläinen; J Sarvas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  The cortical dynamics underlying effective switching of auditory spatial attention.

Authors:  Eric Larson; Adrian K C Lee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Selective attention in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Virginia Best
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-10-30

8.  Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids.

Authors:  J M Festen; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction in the NIDCD/VA follow-up study.

Authors:  Gail Takahashi; Charles D Martinez; Sharon Beamer; Julie Bridges; Douglas Noffsinger; Karen Sugiura; Gene W Bratt; David W Williams
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.570

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  How neuroscience relates to hearing aid amplification.

Authors:  K L Tremblay; C W Miller
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.