Literature DB >> 22971352

Variability of acute extracellular action potential measurements with multisite silicon probes.

Kimberly M Scott1, Jiangang Du, Henry A Lester, Sotiris C Masmanidis.   

Abstract

Device miniaturization technologies have led to significant advances in sensors for extracellular measurements of electrical activity in the brain. Multisite, silicon-based probes containing implantable electrode arrays afford greater coverage of neuronal activity than single electrodes and therefore potentially offer a more complete view of how neuronal ensembles encode information. However, scaling up the number of sites is not sufficient to ensure capture of multiple neurons, as action potential signals from extracellular electrodes may vary due to numerous factors. In order to understand the large-scale recording capabilities and potential limitations of multisite probes, it is important to quantify this variability, and to determine whether certain key device parameters influence the recordings. Here we investigate the effect of four parameters, namely, electrode surface, width of the structural support shafts, shaft number, and position of the recording site relative to the shaft tip. This study employs acutely implanted silicon probes containing up to 64 recording sites, whose performance is evaluated by the metrics of noise, spike amplitude, and spike detection probability. On average, we find no significant effect of device geometry on spike amplitude and detection probability but we find significant differences among individual experiments, with the likelihood of detecting spikes varying by a factor of approximately three across trials.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22971352      PMCID: PMC3473102          DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  33 in total

1.  Intracellular features predicted by extracellular recordings in the hippocampus in vivo.

Authors:  D A Henze; Z Borhegyi; J Csicsvari; A Mamiya; K D Harris; G Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Miniature motorized microdrive and commutator system for chronic neural recording in small animals.

Authors:  M S Fee; A Leonardo
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Chronic neural recording using silicon-substrate microelectrode arrays implanted in cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Rio J Vetter; Justin C Williams; Jamille F Hetke; Elizabeth A Nunamaker; Daryl R Kipke
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 4.  Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles.

Authors:  György Buzsáki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Characterization of neocortical principal cells and interneurons by network interactions and extracellular features.

Authors:  Peter Barthó; Hajime Hirase; Lenaïc Monconduit; Michael Zugaro; Kenneth D Harris; György Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Factors influencing the biocompatibility of insertable silicon microshafts in cerebral cortex.

Authors:  D J Edell; V V Toi; V M McNeil; L D Clark
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Amplitudes of background fast activity characteristic of specific brain sites.

Authors:  J S Buchwald; F S Grover
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Brain responses to micro-machined silicon devices.

Authors:  D H Szarowski; M D Andersen; S Retterer; A J Spence; M Isaacson; H G Craighead; J N Turner; W Shain
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Massively parallel recording of unit and local field potentials with silicon-based electrodes.

Authors:  Jozsef Csicsvari; Darrell A Henze; Brian Jamieson; Kenneth D Harris; Anton Sirota; Péter Barthó; Kensall D Wise; György Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Multiplexed, high density electrophysiology with nanofabricated neural probes.

Authors:  Jiangang Du; Timothy J Blanche; Reid R Harrison; Henry A Lester; Sotiris C Masmanidis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Optical coherence tomography for cross-sectional imaging of neural activity.

Authors:  Yi-Jou Yeh; Adam J Black; David Landowne; Taner Akkin
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 3.593

2.  Experimental study on the mechanical interaction between silicon neural microprobes and rat dura mater during insertion.

Authors:  Z Fekete; A Németh; G Márton; I Ulbert; A Pongrácz
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Durability of high surface area platinum deposits on microelectrode arrays for acute neural recordings.

Authors:  Gergely Márton; István Bakos; Zoltán Fekete; István Ulbert; Anita Pongrácz
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  Biocompatible reference electrodes to enhance chronic electrochemical signal fidelity in vivo.

Authors:  Blake T Seaton; Michael L Heien
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 5.  A comparison of insertion methods for surgical placement of penetrating neural interfaces.

Authors:  Brianna Thielen; Ellis Meng
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 6.  Tools for probing local circuits: high-density silicon probes combined with optogenetics.

Authors:  György Buzsáki; Eran Stark; Antal Berényi; Dion Khodagholy; Daryl R Kipke; Euisik Yoon; Kensall D Wise
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Recording site placement on planar silicon-based probes affects signal quality in acute neuronal recordings.

Authors:  Richárd Fiáth; Domokos Meszéna; Zoltán Somogyvári; Mihály Boda; Péter Barthó; Patrick Ruther; István Ulbert
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Nanotools for neuroscience and brain activity mapping.

Authors:  A Paul Alivisatos; Anne M Andrews; Edward S Boyden; Miyoung Chun; George M Church; Karl Deisseroth; John P Donoghue; Scott E Fraser; Jennifer Lippincott-Schwartz; Loren L Looger; Sotiris Masmanidis; Paul L McEuen; Arto V Nurmikko; Hongkun Park; Darcy S Peterka; Clay Reid; Michael L Roukes; Axel Scherer; Mark Schnitzer; Terrence J Sejnowski; Kenneth L Shepard; Doris Tsao; Gina Turrigiano; Paul S Weiss; Chris Xu; Rafael Yuste; Xiaowei Zhuang
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Does Impedance Matter When Recording Spikes With Polytrodes?

Authors:  Joana P Neto; Pedro Baião; Gonçalo Lopes; João Frazão; Joana Nogueira; Elvira Fortunato; Pedro Barquinha; Adam R Kampff
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.