Literature DB >> 12914963

Brain responses to micro-machined silicon devices.

D H Szarowski1, M D Andersen, S Retterer, A J Spence, M Isaacson, H G Craighead, J N Turner, W Shain.   

Abstract

Micro-machined neural prosthetic devices can be designed and fabricated to permit recording and stimulation of specific sites in the nervous system. Unfortunately, the long-term use of these devices is compromised by cellular encapsulation. The goals of this study were to determine if device size, surface characteristics, or insertion method affected this response. Devices with two general designs were used. One group had chisel-shaped tips, sharp angular corners, and surface irregularities on the micrometer size scale. The second group had rounded corners, and smooth surfaces. Devices of the first group were inserted using a microprocessor-controlled inserter. Devices of the second group were inserted by hand. Comparisons were made of responses to the larger devices in the first group with devices from the second group. Responses were assessed 1 day and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 weeks after insertions. Tissues were immunochemically labeled for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) or vimentin to identify astrocytes, or for ED1 to identify microglia. For the second comparison devices from the first group with different cross-sectional areas were analyzed. Similar reactive responses were observed following insertion of all devices; however, the volume of tissue involved at early times, <1 week, was proportional to the cross-sectional area of the devices. Responses observed after 4 weeks were similar for all devices. Thus, the continued presence of devices promotes formation of a sheath composed partly of reactive astrocytes and microglia. Both GFAP-positive and -negative cells were adherent to all devices. These data indicate that device insertion promotes two responses-an early response that is proportional to device size and a sustained response that is independent of device size, geometry, and surface roughness. The early response may be associated with the amount of damage generated during insertion. The sustained response is more likely due to tissue-device interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12914963     DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(03)03023-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  218 in total

1.  Mechanically adaptive intracortical implants improve the proximity of neuronal cell bodies.

Authors:  J P Harris; J R Capadona; R H Miller; B C Healy; K Shanmuganathan; S J Rowan; C Weder; D J Tyler
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Chronically Implanted, Nafion-Coated Ag/AgCl Reference Electrodes for Neurochemical Applications.

Authors:  Parastoo Hashemi; Paul L Walsh; Thomas S Guillot; Julie Gras-Najjar; Pavel Takmakov; Fulton T Crews; R Mark Wightman
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.418

3.  Voltage biasing, cyclic voltammetry, & electrical impedance spectroscopy for neural interfaces.

Authors:  Seth J Wilks; Tom J Richner; Sarah K Brodnick; Daryl R Kipke; Justin C Williams; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Reduction of neurovascular damage resulting from microelectrode insertion into the cerebral cortex using in vivo two-photon mapping.

Authors:  T D Y Kozai; T C Marzullo; F Hooi; N B Langhals; A K Majewska; E B Brown; D R Kipke
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 5.  Evolution of optogenetic microdevices.

Authors:  Rajas P Kale; Abbas Z Kouzani; Ken Walder; Michael Berk; Susannah J Tye
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.593

Review 6.  A review of the effects of FSCV and microdialysis measurements on dopamine release in the surrounding tissue.

Authors:  Andrea Jaquins-Gerstl; Adrian C Michael
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 4.616

7.  Inhibition of the cluster of differentiation 14 innate immunity pathway with IAXO-101 improves chronic microelectrode performance.

Authors:  John K Hermann; Madhumitha Ravikumar; Andrew J Shoffstall; Evon S Ereifej; Kyle M Kovach; Jeremy Chang; Arielle Soffer; Chun Wong; Vishnupriya Srivastava; Patrick Smith; Grace Protasiewicz; Jingle Jiang; Stephen M Selkirk; Robert H Miller; Steven Sidik; Nicholas P Ziats; Dawn M Taylor; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  The Effect of Residual Endotoxin Contamination on the Neuroinflammatory Response to Sterilized Intracortical Microelectrodes.

Authors:  Madhumitha Ravikumar; Daniel J Hageman; William H Tomaszewski; Gabriella M Chandra; John L Skousen; Jeffrey R Capadona
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 6.331

9.  Failure mode analysis of silicon-based intracortical microelectrode arrays in non-human primates.

Authors:  James C Barrese; Naveen Rao; Kaivon Paroo; Corey Triebwasser; Carlos Vargas-Irwin; Lachlan Franquemont; John P Donoghue
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Injectable, cellular-scale optoelectronics with applications for wireless optogenetics.

Authors:  Tae-il Kim; Jordan G McCall; Yei Hwan Jung; Xian Huang; Edward R Siuda; Yuhang Li; Jizhou Song; Young Min Song; Hsuan An Pao; Rak-Hwan Kim; Chaofeng Lu; Sung Dan Lee; Il-Sun Song; Gunchul Shin; Ream Al-Hasani; Stanley Kim; Meng Peun Tan; Yonggang Huang; Fiorenzo G Omenetto; John A Rogers; Michael R Bruchas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.