Literature DB >> 22969187

Pancreatico-biliary endoscopic ultrasound: a systematic review of the levels of evidence, performance and outcomes.

Pietro Fusaroli1, Dimitrios Kypraios, Giancarlo Caletti, Mohamad A Eloubeidi.   

Abstract

Our aim was to record pancreaticobiliary endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) literature of the past 3 decades and evaluate its role based on a critical appraisal of published studies according to levels of evidence (LE). Original research articles (randomized controlled trials, prospective and retrospective studies), meta-analyses, reviews and surveys pertinent to gastrointestinal EUS were included. All articles published until September 2011 were retrieved from PubMed and classified according to specific disease entities, anatomical subdivisions and therapeutic applications of EUS. The North of England evidence-based guidelines were used to determine LE. A total of 1089 pertinent articles were reviewed. Published research focused primarily on solid pancreatic neoplasms, followed by disorders of the extrahepatic biliary tree, pancreatic cystic lesions, therapeutic-interventional EUS, chronic and acute pancreatitis. A uniform observation in all six categories of articles was the predominance of LE III studies followed by LE IV, II b, II a, I b and I a, in descending order. EUS remains the most accurate method for detecting small (< 3 cm) pancreatic tumors, ampullary neoplasms and small (< 4 mm) bile duct stones, and the best test to define vascular invasion in pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasms. Detailed EUS imaging, along with biochemical and molecular cyst fluid analysis, improve the differentiation of pancreatic cysts and help predict their malignant potential. Early diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis appears feasible and reliable. Novel imaging techniques (contrast-enhanced EUS, elastography) seem promising for the evaluation of pancreatic cancer and autoimmune pancreatitis. Therapeutic applications currently involve pancreaticobiliary drainage and targeted fine needle injection-guided antitumor therapy. Despite the ongoing development of extra-corporeal imaging modalities, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography, EUS still holds a leading role in the investigation of the pancreaticobiliary area. The major challenge of EUS evolution is its expanding therapeutic potential towards an effective and minimally invasive management of complex pancreaticobiliary disorders.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute pancreatitis; Bile duct stones; Chronic pancreatitis; Contrast harmonic endoscopic ultrasound; Duct drainage; Endoscopic ultrasound; Fine needle aspiration; Pancreatic cysts; Pancreatic tumors

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22969187      PMCID: PMC3436039          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  135 in total

Review 1.  Scientific publications in endoscopic ultrasonography: changing trends in the third millennium.

Authors:  Pietro Fusaroli; Dimitrios Kypreos; Chiara Ada Alma Petrini; Giancarlo Caletti
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

2.  Natural history of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: a multicenter study in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Maguchi; Satoshi Tanno; Nobumasa Mizuno; Keiji Hanada; Go Kobayashi; Takashi Hatori; Yoshihiko Sadakari; Taketo Yamaguchi; Kosuke Tobita; Ryuichiro Doi; Akio Yanagisawa; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.327

3.  Comparison between endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for the staging of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Vanessa M Shami; Anshu Mahajan; Michelle M Loch; Alejandro C Stella; Patrick G Northup; Grace E White; Andrew S Brock; Indu Srinivasan; Eduard E de Lange; Michel Kahaleh
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 4.  Endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stefania De Lisi; Gioacchino Leandro; Elisabetta Buscarini
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.566

5.  Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the etiological diagnosis of "idiopathic" acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Alejandro Repiso Ortega; Rafael Gómez-Rodríguez; Marta Romero; Soledad Fernández-Zapardiel; María del Mar Céspedes; José-María Carrobles
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  EUS compared with CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography and the influence of biliary stenting on staging accuracy of ampullary neoplasms.

Authors:  M E Cannon; S L Carpenter; G H Elta; T T Nostrant; M L Kochman; G G Ginsberg; B Stotland; E F Rosato; J B Morris; F Eckhauser; J M Scheiman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Prognostic value of endoscopic ultrasound in acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Rasoul Sotoudehmanesh; Afshin Hooshyar; Shadi Kolahdoozan; Fatemeh Zeinali; Shadi Shahraeeni; Abbas-Ali Keshtkar
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 3.996

8.  EUS is still superior to multidetector computerized tomography for detection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Mouen A Khashab; Elaine Yong; Anne Marie Lennon; Eun Ji Shin; Stuart Amateau; Ralph H Hruban; Kelly Olino; Samuel Giday; Elliot K Fishman; Christopher L Wolfgang; Barish H Edil; Martin Makary; Marcia Irene Canto
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Prospective assessment of the ability of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose, exclude, or establish the severity of chronic pancreatitis found by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  A V Sahai; M Zimmerman; L Aabakken; P R Tarnasky; J T Cunningham; A van Velse; R H Hawes; B J Hoffman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  John DeWitt; Benedict Devereaux; Melissa Chriswell; Kathleen McGreevy; Thomas Howard; Thomas F Imperiale; Donato Ciaccia; Kathleen A Lane; Dean Maglinte; Kenyon Kopecky; Julia LeBlanc; Lee McHenry; James Madura; Alex Aisen; Harvey Cramer; Oscar Cummings; Stuart Sherman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic evaluation of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Tokar; Rohit Walia
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2013-10

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasound in gastroenterology: from diagnosis to therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Mohamed A Mekky; Wael A Abbas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments: are we getting evidence based--a systematic review.

Authors:  Carlo Fabbri; Carmelo Luigiano; Andrea Lisotti; Vincenzo Cennamo; Clara Virgilio; Giancarlo Caletti; Pietro Fusaroli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Early endoscopic ultrasonography in acute biliary pancreatitis: A prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Andrea Anderloni; Marianna Galeazzi; Marco Ballarè; Michela Pagliarulo; Marco Orsello; Mario Del Piano; Alessandro Repici
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  PRSS1_p.Leu81Met mutation results in autoimmune pancreatitis.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Yue-Ming Li; Guo-Lin Hong; Zhi-Feng Xu; Qi-Cai Liu; Qing-Liang He; Li-Qing Lin; Shao-Huang Weng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  Valeriu Şurlin; Adrian Săftoiu; Daniela Dumitrescu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Tumors and new endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapies.

Authors:  Silvia Carrara; Maria Chiara Petrone; Pier Alberto Testoni; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04-16

8.  Endoscopic ultrasonography for pancreatic cancer: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  Claudio De Angelis; Rosario Francesco Brizzi; Rinaldo Pellicano
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-06

Review 9.  Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Eun Sun Lee; Jeong Min Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Interobserver agreement of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  João-Bruno Soares; Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Bruno Gonçalves; Björn Lindkvist; Jose Lariño-Noia; Pedro Bastos; Ana Célia Caetano; Aníbal Ferreira; Pedro Pimentel-Nunes; Luís Lopes; Pedro Moutinho; J Enrique Dominguez-Muñoz
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.