| Literature DB >> 25024600 |
Carlo Fabbri1, Carmelo Luigiano1, Andrea Lisotti1, Vincenzo Cennamo1, Clara Virgilio1, Giancarlo Caletti1, Pietro Fusaroli1.
Abstract
The continued need to develop less invasive alternatives to surgical and radiologic interventions has driven the development of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatments. These include EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, EUS-guided necrosectomy, EUS-guided cholangiography and biliary drainage, EUS-guided pancreatography and pancreatic duct drainage, EUS-guided gallbladder drainage, EUS-guided drainage of abdominal and pelvic fluid collections, EUS-guided celiac plexus block and celiac plexus neurolysis, EUS-guided pancreatic cyst ablation, EUS-guided vascular interventions, EUS-guided delivery of antitumoral agents and EUS-guided fiducial placement and brachytherapy. However these procedures are technically challenging and require expertise in both EUS and interventional endoscopy, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and gastrointestinal stenting. We undertook a systematic review to record the entire body of literature accumulated over the past 2 decades on EUS-guided interventions with the objective of performing a critical appraisal of published articles, based on the classification of studies according to levels of evidence, in order to assess the scientific progress made in this field.Entities:
Keywords: Celiac plexus neurolysis; Endoscopic ultrasound; Fine needle injection; Levels of evidence; Necrosectomy; Pseudocyst drainage
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25024600 PMCID: PMC4093695 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i26.8424
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1007-9327 Impact factor: 5.742