Literature DB >> 23996593

Diagnostic evaluation of solid pancreatic masses.

Jeffrey L Tokar1, Rohit Walia.   

Abstract

Determining the etiology of a solid pancreatic lesion is a critical first step toward developing an appropriate treatment plan for patients with a benign or malignant pancreatic mass. Technological advances in cross-sectional and endoscopic imaging modalities offer pancreatic imaging options with degrees of resolution that were not available even 15-20 years ago. In most cases, the nature of a solid pancreatic mass can be determined using computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration. Knowledge about the basics of these modalities, as well as their strengths and limitations, plays an important role in understanding how patients with solid pancreatic masses should be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23996593     DOI: 10.1007/s11894-013-0347-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep        ISSN: 1522-8037


  92 in total

Review 1.  Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kajsa E Affolter; Robert L Schmidt; Anna P Matynia; Douglas G Adler; Rachel E Factor
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  An evaluation of risk factors for inadequate cytology in EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic tumors and lymph nodes.

Authors:  Patrick Cleveland; Kanwar Rupinder S Gill; Susan G Coe; Timothy A Woodward; Massimo Raimondo; Laith Jamil; Seth A Gross; Michael G Heckman; Julia E Crook; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; J Enrique Dominguez-Munoz; Ihab Abdulkader; Jose Larino-Noia; Elena Eugenyeva; Antonio Lozano-Leon; Jeronimo Forteza-Vila
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  K J Chang; P Nguyen; R A Erickson; T E Durbin; K D Katz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  John Dewitt; Benedict M Devereaux; Glen A Lehman; Stuart Sherman; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration characteristics of primary adenocarcinoma versus other malignant neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Veronika Gagovic; Bret J Spier; Ryan J DeLee; Courtney Barancin; Mary Lindstrom; Michael Einstein; Siobhan Byrne; Josephine Harter; Rashmi Agni; Patrick R Pfau; Terrence J Frick; Anurag Soni; Deepak V Gopal
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.522

7.  Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis with atypical pancreatic imaging findings from pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Tae Yoon Lee; Myung-Hwan Kim; Do Hyun Park; Dong Wan Seo; Sung Koo Lee; Jae Seung Kim; Kyu Taek Lee
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Comparison between multislice CT and MR imaging in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with pancreatic masses.

Authors:  M Fusari; S Maurea; M Imbriaco; C Mollica; G Avitabile; F Soscia; L Camera; M Salvatore
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 9.  The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M F Madhoun; S B Wani; A Rastogi; D Early; S Gaddam; W M Tierney; J T Maple
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Rapid on-site evaluation by endosonographer during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Hayashi; Hirotoshi Ishiwatari; Makoto Yoshida; Michihiro Ono; Tsutomu Sato; Koji Miyanishi; Yasushi Sato; Masayoshi Kobune; Rishu Takimoto; Tomoko Mitsuhashi; Hiroko Asanuma; Jiro Ogino; Tadashi Hasegawa; Tomoko Sonoda; Junji Kato
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.029

View more
  5 in total

1.  The value of liver magnetic resonance imaging in patients with findings of resectable pancreatic cancer on computed tomography.

Authors:  Cindy Chew; Patrick J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 2.  Imaging preoperatively for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jason Alan Pietryga; Desiree E Morgan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-08

3.  Differentiation of benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses using magnetic resonance elastography with spin-echo echo planar imaging and three-dimensional inversion reconstruction: a prospective study.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Feng Gao; Yue Li; Shengzhen Tao; Bing Yu; Zaiyi Liu; Yanqing Liu; Kevin J Glaser; Richard L Ehman; Qiyong Guo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  [Ductal adenocarcinoma and unusual differential diagnosis].

Authors:  P Haage; C A Schwartz; C Scharwächter
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomographic characterisation of pancreatic cystic lesions: A prospective study.

Authors:  Dar M Saleem; Wani A Haseeb; Arshed H Parry; Robbani Irfan; Najar M Muzaffar; Gojwari Tariq; Shah O Javed; Imza Feroz
Journal:  SA J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.