Literature DB >> 10385718

EUS compared with CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography and the influence of biliary stenting on staging accuracy of ampullary neoplasms.

M E Cannon1, S L Carpenter, G H Elta, T T Nostrant, M L Kochman, G G Ginsberg, B Stotland, E F Rosato, J B Morris, F Eckhauser, J M Scheiman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and transabdominal ultrasound frequently fail to detect ampullary lesions. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is a sensitive modality for detecting and staging ampullary tumors. Accurate staging may be affected by biliary stenting, which is frequently performed in these patients with obstructive jaundice. The present study assessed the accuracy of ampullary tumor staging with multiple imaging modalities in patients with and those without endobiliary stents.
METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with ampullary neoplasms from two endosonography centers were preoperatively staged by EUS plus CT (37 patients), MRI (13 patients), or angiography (10 patients) over a 3(1/2) year period. Twenty-five of the 50 patients had a transpapillary endobiliary stent present at the time of endosonographic examination. Accuracy of EUS, CT, MRI, and angiography was assessed with the TNM classification system and compared with surgical-pathologic staging. The influence of an endobiliary stent present at the time of EUS on staging accuracy of EUS was also evaluated.
RESULTS: EUS was more accurate than CT and MRI in the overall assessment of the T stage of ampullary neoplasms (EUS 78%, CT 24%, MRI 46%). No significant difference in N stage accuracy was noted between the three imaging modalities (EUS 68%, CT 59%, MRI 77%). EUS T stage accuracy was reduced from 84% to 72% in the presence of a transpapillary endobiliary stent. This was most prominent in the understaging of T2/T3 carcinomas.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS is superior to CT and MRI in assessing T stage but not N stage of ampullary lesions. The presence of an endobiliary stent at EUS may result in underestimating the need for a Whipple resection because of tumor understaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10385718     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70340-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  56 in total

Review 1.  Imaging for the diagnosis and staging of periampullary carcinomas.

Authors:  R M Walsh; M Connelly; M Baker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Impact of biliary stents on EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic mass lesions.

Authors:  Nathaniel Ranney; Milind Phadnis; Jessica Trevino; Jayapal Ramesh; C Mel Wilcox; Shyam Varadarajulu
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 3.  Endoscopic management of adenomatous ampullary lesions.

Authors:  Jesús Espinel; Eugenia Pinedo; Vanesa Ojeda; Maria Guerra Del Rio
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2015-09-26

4.  Management of ampullary lesions.

Authors:  George W Dittrick; Damien B Mallat; Jeffrey P Lamont
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09

Review 5.  Interventional upper endoscopy: the adult perspective.

Authors:  Tonya Kaltenbach; Seth Crockett; George Triadafilopoulos
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2006-12

6.  New approach to diagnosing ampullary tumors by magnifying endoscopy combined with a narrow-band imaging system.

Authors:  Yujiro Uchiyama; Hiroo Imazu; Hiroshi Kakutani; Shoryoku Hino; Kazuki Sumiyama; Akira Kuramochi; Shintaro Tsukinaga; Kazuhiro Matsunaga; Takashi Nakayoshi; Ken-ichi Goda; Shoichi Saito; Mitsuru Kaise; Muneo Kawamuara; Salem Omar; Hisao Tajiri
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  Prognostic impact of perineural invasion following pancreatoduodenectomy with lymphadenectomy for ampullary carcinoma.

Authors:  Takeshi Sudo; Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Yasuo Hayashidani; Yasushi Hashimoto; Hiroki Ohge; Fumio Shimamoto; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Computed tomography-based diagnostics might be insufficient in the determination of pancreatic cancer unresectability.

Authors:  Vyacheslav I Egorov; Roman V Petrov; Elena N Solodinina; Gregory G Karmazanovsky; Natalia S Starostina; Natalia A Kuruschkina
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-27

9.  Endoscopic resection of ampullary lesions: a single-center 8-year retrospective cohort study of 91 patients with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Wim Laleman; Annelies Verreth; Baki Topal; Raymond Aerts; Mina Komuta; Tania Roskams; Schalk Van der Merwe; David Cassiman; Frederik Nevens; Chris Verslype; Werner Van Steenbergen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Endoscopic papillectomy: indications, techniques, and results.

Authors:  Giovanni D De Palma
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.