Literature DB >> 7126325

Contribution of striate inputs to the visuospatial functions of parieto-preoccipital cortex in monkeys.

M Mishkin, L G Ungerleider.   

Abstract

In Experiments 1 and 2, monkeys received 3-stage operations intended to serially disconnect parieto-preoccipital from striate cortex. At each stage (unilateral parieto-preoccipital removal, contralateral striate removal and posterior callosal transection) the monkeys were tested for retention of the landmark task, a visuospatial discrimination sensitive to the effects of bilateral parieto-preoccipital damage. To check the effectiveness of the disconnection, the monkeys were also tested after removal of the remaining parieto-preoccipital cortex. The results demonstrated that corticocortical inputs from striate cortex are crucial for the visuospatial functions of parieto-preoccipital cortex, just as they had been shown earlier to be crucial for the pattern discrimination functions of inferior temporal cortex. Relative to inferior temporal cortex, however, parieto-preoccipital cortex was found to be especially dependent on ipsilateral (as compared with contralateral) striate inputs. In Experiment 3, monkeys received bilateral lesions of either lateral on medial striate cortex and were tested on both a pattern discrimination task, to assess residual inferior temporal function, and the landmark task, to assess residual parieto-preoccipital function. The results indicated that the pattern discrimination functions of inferior temporal cortex are especially dependent on inputs from lateral striate cortex, whereas the visuospatial functions of parieto-preoccipital cortex are equally dependent on inputs from lateral and medial striate cortex. The relatively greater contribution to parieto-preoccipital than to inferior temporal cortex made by ipsilateral and medial striate inputs (representing contralateral and peripheral visual fields, respectively) can also be seen in the receptive field properties of parieto-preoccipital and inferior temporal neurons. The differences in the organization of striate inputs to these two cortical association areas presumably reflect differences in the processing required for spatial vs object vision.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7126325     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(82)90081-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  190 in total

1.  Specialization in the vicarious learning of novel arbitrary sequences in humans but not orangutans.

Authors:  Elizabeth Renner; Eric M Patterson; Francys Subiaul
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Fabrication of an inexpensive, implantable cooling device for reversible brain deactivation in animals ranging from rodents to primates.

Authors:  Dylan F Cooke; Adam B Goldring; Itsukyo Yamayoshi; Phillippos Tsourkas; Gregg H Recanzone; Alex Tiriac; Tingrui Pan; Scott I Simon; Leah Krubitzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Grab an object with a tool and change your body: tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action.

Authors:  Lucilla Cardinali; Stéphane Jacobs; Claudio Brozzoli; Francesca Frassinetti; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Dorsal and ventral streams across sensory modalities.

Authors:  Anna Sedda; Federica Scarpina
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.203

5.  Anatomical constraints on attention: hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Jonathan Gill; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Unravelling the development of the visual cortex: implications for plasticity and repair.

Authors:  James A Bourne
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 7.  How environment and self-motion combine in neural representations of space.

Authors:  Talfan Evans; Andrej Bicanski; Daniel Bush; Neil Burgess
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Gamma activity modulated by naming of ambiguous and unambiguous images: intracranial recording.

Authors:  Yoshimi Cho-Hisamoto; Katsuaki Kojima; Erik C Brown; Naoyuki Matsuzaki; Eishi Asano
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Cortical projections to the two retinotopic maps of primate pulvinar are distinct.

Authors:  Brandon Moore; Keji Li; Jon H Kaas; Chia-Chi Liao; Andrew M Boal; Julia Mavity-Hudson; Vivien Casagrande
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  The first-night effect suppresses the strength of slow-wave activity originating in the visual areas during sleep.

Authors:  Masako Tamaki; Ji Won Bang; Takeo Watanabe; Yuka Sasaki
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.