| Literature DB >> 22963132 |
Steven D Leavitt1, Theodore L Esslinger, Pradeep K Divakar, H Thorsten Lumbsch.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Factors promoting diversification in lichen symbioses remain largely unexplored. While Pleistocene events have been important for driving diversification and affecting distributions in many groups, recent estimates suggest that major radiations within some genera in the largest clade of macrolichens (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) vastly predate the Pleistocene. To better understand the temporal placement and sequence of diversification events in lichens, we estimated divergence times in a common lichen-forming fungal genus, Melanohalea, in the Northern Hemisphere. Divergence times were estimated using both concatenated gene tree and coalescent-based multilocus species tree approaches to assess the temporal context of major radiation events within Melanohalea. In order to complement our understanding of processes impacting genetic differentiation, we also evaluated the effects of Pleistocene glacial cycles on population demographics of distinct Melanohalea lineages, differing in reproductive strategies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22963132 PMCID: PMC3499221 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-176
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Genetic variability in Melanohalea of sampled markers used in this study, including: the number of specimens, , alignment length (number of base pairs); variable and parsimony-informative (PI) sites for each sampled locus; and locus-specific model of evolution identified using the Akaike information criterion in jModeltest
| ITS (Total) | 487 (176) | 511 | 191 | 153 | TIM1ef + I + G |
| ITS | 137 (99) | 511 | 179 | 146 | TIM1ef + I + G |
| nuLSU | 126 (57) | 529 | 65 | 52 | TPM2 + G |
| mtSSU | 101 (33) | 794 | 68 | 55 | TPM1uf + I |
| 105 (72) | 514 | 151 | 132 | TIM3ef + I | |
| 109 (59) | 775 | 223 | 186 | TIM2ef + I + G | |
| 103 (53) | 716 | 182 | 155 | TPM2uf + I + G |
Estimates of substitution rates in from the BEAST analysis of the concatenated six-loci dataset estimated under a relax molecular clock using fixed substitution rates for the nuLSU, mtSSU, and 1 markers [12]
| Locus | Rate | Rate 95% HPD | Rate | Rate 95% HPD |
| ITS | 3.296 | 2.49 – 4.11 | 3.41 | 2.67 – 4.17 |
| LSU | 0.684 | 0.58 – 0.80 | 0.71 | 0.62 – 0.80 |
| mtSSU | 0.701 | 0.42 – 1.05 | 0.66 | 0.44 – 0.92 |
| 1.649 | 1.26 – 2.05 | 1.71 | 1.36 – 2.08 | |
| 1.548 | 1.27 – 1.82 | 1.70 | 1.57 – 1.83 | |
| 1.391 | 1.08 – 1.75 | 1.51 | 1.20 – 1.82 | |
Units: substitution/site/year X 10-9. HPD: highest posterior density interval.
Figure 1Dated BEAST maximum clade credibility tree for estimated from concatenated data. The chronogram was estimated from a partitioned data set consisting of six loci (ITS, nuLSU, mtSSU, MCM7, RPB1, RPB2) under a relaxed molecular clock. The divergence times correspond to the mean posterior estimate of their age in millions of years. The bars indicate the 95% HPD interval for the divergence times estimates. The four major Melanohalea clades identified in this study are indicated by ‘1’, ‘2’, ‘3’, and ‘4’ at the corresponding node. Values on branches indicate posterior probability, and only support indices posterior probability values > 0.50 are presented.
Figure 2Dated multilocus coalescent-based species tree for The chronogram was estimated from a multilocus data (ITS, nuLSU, mtSSU, MCM7, RPB1, RPB2) within a coalescent-based framework in *BEAST. The divergence times correspond to the mean posterior estimate of their age in millions of years. The bars indicate the 95% HPD interval for the divergence times estimates. The four major Melanohalea clades identified in this study are indicated by ‘1’, ‘2’, ‘3’, and ‘4’ at the corresponding node. Values on branches indicate posterior probability, and only support indices posterior probability values > 0.50 are presented.
The dates of origin of lineages of from their initial divergence (ancestral splits; stem origin) and the time to the most recent common ancestor (tmrca) of extant haplotypes
| 43.5 (95% HPD = 26.9-59.7) | 35.2 (95% HPD = 27.0-43.5) | NA | |
| Origin of | 30.2 (95% HPD = 23.8- 38.1) | NA | |
| 3.90 (−) | 2.7 (95% HPD = 1.0-4.4) | ||
| 3.9 (−) | 2.7 (95% HPD = 1.0-4.4) | - | |
| 14.8 (95% HPD = 10.8-19.7) | |||
| 4.2 (−) | |||
| 6.0 (95% HPD = 4.1-8.4) | 3.7 (−) | ||
| 0.9 (95% HPD = 0.0-1.8) | |||
| 7.4 (95% HPD = 4.6-10.3) | |||
| 1.3 (95% HPD = 0.1-2.4) | |||
| 0.9 (95% HPD = 0.0-1.8) | |||
| 6.0 (95% HPD = 4.3-7.8) | |||
| 1.3 (95% HPD = 0.1-2.4) | 1.0 (95% HPD = 0.2-2.2) | ||
| 8.4 (95% HPD = 6.0-11.0) | |||
| - | |||
| Split 1 | NA | ||
| Split 2 | NA | ||
| Split 3 | NA | ||
| Split 4 | NA |
Bolded values correspond to posterioir support values greater than 95%;.
‘-’ corresponds to posterioir support less than 50%.
Estimates of genetic diversity for sampled lineages within
| 487 | 146 | 0.956 | 142 | 0.0481 | - | - | - | - | - | |
| 100 | 16 | 0.478 | 15 | 0.0017 | 0.09731746 | |||||
| 1 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 11 | 8 | 0.927 | 21 | 0.0140 | −0.9720 | −1.3005 | −1.144 | 0.11438 | 0.031023 | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0.0224 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 105 | 13 | 0.756 | 17 | 0.0039 | −1.5449 | −1.9654 | −4.29 | 0.068649 | ||
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 11 | 3 | 0.564 | 2 | 0.0017 | 0.0362 | −0.2696 | −0.113 | 0.094215 | 0.000715 | |
| 16 | 5 | 0.833 | 3 | 0.0032 | 1.2695 | 1.2620 | −0.768 | 0.156667 | 0.023146 | |
| 3 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 14 | 2 | 0.143 | 1 | 0.0004 | −1.1552 | −1.5139 | −0.595 | 0.168216 | 0.005273 | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.0024 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 26 | 15 | 0.911 | 31 | 0.0150 | −1.0675 | −0.7554 | −3.234 | 0.015233 | 0.007078 | |
| 34 | 24 | 0.959 | 26 | 0.0092 | −1.5576 | −19.249 | 0.018858 | 0.000997 | ||
| 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 3 | 2 | 0.667 | 3 | 0.0050 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 31 | 9 | 0.501 | 16 | 0.0048 | −1.7399 | −2.4269 | −2.221 | 0.169296 | 0.304035 | |
| 10 | 3 | 0.378 | 5 | 0.0025 | −2.1790 | 0.477 | 0.285432 | 0.039008 | ||
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0.0141 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 9 | 7 | 0.917 | 15 | 0.0100 | −0.4538 | −0.7083 | −1.23 | 0.110969 | 0.046933 | |
| 76 | 43 | 0.945 | 30 | 0.0107 | −0.9541 | −2.2016 | −20.111 | 0.008245 | 0.00313 | |
| 10 | 3 | 0.6 | 5 | 0.0056 | 0.8301 | 0.7679 | 2.146 | 0.102222 | 0.043291 | |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.0075 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
n = sample size, h = number of haplotypes, Hd = haplotypic diversity, S = number of segregating (polymorphic) sites, π = nucleotide diversity, Fs = Fu’s F statistic, RI = raggedness index, SSD = sum of squared deviations. Bolded values indicate significant Tajima D, Fu’s F statistic, RI and SSD values.
Figure 3Bayesian skyline plots for (A) two species commonly propagating via vegetative diaspores (and ) and (B) four sexually reproducing lineages (3, , , and 2). The solid black line represents the median value for the log of the population size (log Ne) and the grey lines represent the upper and lower 95% credible intervals. The x-axis measures times in thousands of years. Generation times are not known for Melanohalea species and population sizes (y-axis) only represent relative changes.
All primers used for PCR amplification and sequencing in this study
| ITS1F | 5’-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3’ | 55-60 | [ | |
| | ITS_Mel_F | 5’- TGCTTTGGCGGRYCYYRRG-3’ | 55-60 | This study |
| | ITS4 | 5’-TCC CCGCTTATTGATATGC-3’ | 55-60 | [ |
| | ITS4A | 5’- CGCCGTTACTGGGGCAATCCCTG-3’ | 55-60 | [ |
| | ITS4 | 5’-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3’ | 55-60 | [ |
| Al2R | 5’-GCGAGTGAAGCGGCAACAGCTC3’ | 55-60 | [ | |
| | LR3 | 5’-CCGTGTTTCAAGACGGG-3’ | 55-60 | Vilgalys unpublished |
| mrSSU1 | 5’-AGCAGTGAGGAATATTGGTC-3’ | 55-60 | [ | |
| | mrSSU3R | 5’-ATGTGGCACGTCTATAGCCC-3’ | 55-60 | [ |
| Mcm7-709for | 5’-ACIMGIGTITCVGAYGTHAARCC-3’ | 56 | [ | |
| | Mcm7-1348rev | 5’-GAYTTDGCIACICCIGGRTCWCCCAT-3’ | 56 | [ |
| | X_Mcm7_F | 5’-CGTACACYTGTGATCGATGTG-3’ | 56 | [ |
| | X_Mcm7_R | 5’- GTC TCC ACG TAT TCG CAT TCC-3’ | 56 | [ |
| gRPB1-A for | 5’-GAKTGTCCKGGWCATTTTGG-3’ | 54-56 | [ | |
| | fRPB1-C rev | 5’-CCNGCDATNTCRTTRTCCATRTA-3’ | 54-56 | [ |
| | RPB1_MH_F | 5’-ACGTCGCCGAGACCCHAARA-3’ | 54-56 | This study |
| RPB2-6F | 5’-TGGGGKWTGGTYTGYCCTGC-3’ | 50-56 | [ | |
| | fRRPB2-7cR | 5’-CCCATRGCTTGYTTRCCCAT-3’ | 50-56 | [ |
| | RPB2_MH_F | 5’-ACAGTCGGTACWCCCAGYGAGCC-3’ | 50-56 | This study |
| RPB2_MH_R | 5’-TGCCCATAGCCGATTGGTAYGTATT-3’ | 50-56 | This study |