Literature DB >> 22962560

Community engagement in biobanking: Experiences from the eMERGE Network.

Amy A Lemke1, Joel T Wu, Carol Waudby, Jill Pulley, Carol P Somkin, Susan Brown Trinidad.   

Abstract

Advances in genomic technologies and the promise of "personalised medicine" have spurred the interest of researchers, healthcare systems, and the general public. However, the success of population-based genetic studies depends on the willingness of large numbers of individuals and diverse communities to grant researchers access to detailed medical and genetic information. Certain features of this kind of research - such as the establishment of biobanks and prospective data collection from participants' electronic medical records - make the potential risks and benefits to participants difficult to specify in advance. Therefore, community input into biobank processes is essential. In this report, we describe community engagement efforts undertaken by six United States biobanks, various outcomes from these engagements, and lessons learned. Our aim is to provide useful insights and potential strategies for the various disciplines that work with communities involved in biobank-based genomic research.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22962560      PMCID: PMC3434453          DOI: 10.1186/1746-5354-6-3-50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genom Soc Policy        ISSN: 1746-5354


  35 in total

1.  A vision for the future of genomics research.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Eric D Green; Alan E Guttmacher; Mark S Guyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The path to personalized medicine.

Authors:  Margaret A Hamburg; Francis S Collins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Community engagement and informed consent in the International HapMap project.

Authors:  Charles Rotimi; Mark Leppert; Ichiro Matsuda; Changqing Zeng; Houcan Zhang; Clement Adebamowo; Ike Ajayi; Toyin Aniagwu; Missy Dixon; Yoshimitsu Fukushima; Darryl Macer; Patricia Marshall; Chibuzor Nkwodimmah; Andy Peiffer; Charmaine Royal; Eiko Suda; Hui Zhao; Vivian Ota Wang; Jean McEwen
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2007

4.  Getting personal: the promises and pitfalls of personalized medicine.

Authors:  Jeffrey Laurence
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 7.012

Review 5.  Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health.

Authors:  B A Israel; A J Schulz; E A Parker; A B Becker
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 21.981

6.  The disclosure of diagnosis codes can breach research participants' privacy.

Authors:  Grigorios Loukides; Joshua C Denny; Bradley Malin
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Yann Joly; Jacques Simard; Francine Durocher
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  The eMERGE Network: a consortium of biorepositories linked to electronic medical records data for conducting genomic studies.

Authors:  Catherine A McCarty; Rex L Chisholm; Christopher G Chute; Iftikhar J Kullo; Gail P Jarvik; Eric B Larson; Rongling Li; Daniel R Masys; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dan M Roden; Jeffery P Struewing; Wendy A Wolf
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.063

9.  Incidental findings in genetics research using archived DNA.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

10.  Working with Concepts: The Role of Community in International Collaborative Biomedical Research.

Authors:  V M Marsh; D K Kamuya; M J Parker; C S Molyneux
Journal:  Public Health Ethics       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 1.940

View more
  24 in total

1.  Community Perceptions of Biobanking Participation: A Qualitative Study among Mexican-Americans in Three Texas Cities.

Authors:  Natalia I Heredia; Sarah Krasny; Larkin L Strong; Laura Von Hatten; Lynne Nguyen; Belinda M Reininger; Lorna H McNeill; María E Fernández
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 2.  Within and beyond the communal turn to informed consent in industry-sponsored pharmacogenetics research: merits and challenges of community advisory boards.

Authors:  Hojjat Soofi; Evert van Leeuwen
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2016-08-05

Review 3.  Genome-wide association studies in Africans and African Americans: expanding the framework of the genomics of human traits and disease.

Authors:  Emmanuel Peprah; Huichun Xu; Fasil Tekola-Ayele; Charmaine D Royal
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Community engagement in US biobanking: multiplicity of meaning and method.

Authors:  K M Haldeman; R J Cadigan; A Davis; A Goldenberg; G E Henderson; D Lassiter; E Reavely
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 2.000

5.  Merging Electronic Health Record Data and Genomics for Cardiovascular Research: A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hall; John J Ryan; Bruce E Bray; Candice Brown; David Lanfear; L Kristin Newby; Mary V Relling; Neil J Risch; Dan M Roden; Stanley Y Shaw; James E Tcheng; Jessica Tenenbaum; Thomas N Wang; William S Weintraub
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2016-03-14

6.  Consulting the community: public expectations and attitudes about genetics research.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Jane Green; Elizabeth Dicks; Daryl Pullman; Catherine Street; Patrick Parfrey
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Community engagement with genetics: public perceptions and expectations about genetics research.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Jane Green; Patrick Parfrey; Catherine Street; Daryl Pullman
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions.

Authors:  Christine Grady; Lisa Eckstein; Ben Berkman; Dan Brock; Robert Cook-Deegan; Stephanie M Fullerton; Hank Greely; Mats G Hansson; Sara Hull; Scott Kim; Bernie Lo; Rebecca Pentz; Laura Rodriguez; Carol Weil; Benjamin S Wilfond; David Wendler
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.229

9.  Extending the surrogacy analogy: applying the advance directive model to biobanks.

Authors:  Stephanie Solomon; Ann Mongoven
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Stakeholder engagement in policy development: challenges and opportunities for human genomics.

Authors:  Amy A Lemke; Julie N Harris-Wai
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.