Literature DB >> 32159239

Operative and nonoperative management of anterior cruciate ligament injury: Differences in gait biomechanics at 5 years.

Elizabeth Wellsandt1,2, Ashutosh Khandha2,3, Jacob Capin1,4,5, Thomas S Buchanan2,6, Lynn Snyder-Mackler2,7.   

Abstract

Gait biomechanics after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are associated with functional outcomes and the development of posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis. However, biomechanical outcomes between patients treated nonoperatively compared with operatively are not well understood. The primary purpose of this study was to compare knee joint contact forces, angles, and moments during loading response of gait between individuals treated with operative compared with nonoperative management at 5 years after ACL injury. Forty athletes treated operatively and 17 athletes treated nonoperatively completed gait analysis at 5 years after ACL reconstruction or completion of nonoperative rehabilitation. Medial compartment joint contact forces were estimated using a previously validated, patient-specific electromyography-driven musculoskeletal model. Knee joint contact forces, angles, and moments were compared between the operative and nonoperative group using mixed model 2 × 2 analyses of variance. Peak medial compartment contact forces were larger in the involved limb of the nonoperative group (Op: 2.37 ± 0.47 BW, Non-Op: 3.03 ± 0.53 BW; effect size: 1.36). Peak external knee adduction moment was also larger in the involved limb of the nonoperative group (Op: 0.25 ± 0.08 Nm/kg·m, Non-Op: 0.32 ± 0.09 Nm/kg·m; effect size: 0.89). No differences in radiographic tibiofemoral osteoarthritis were present between the operative and nonoperative groups. Overall, participants treated nonoperatively walked with greater measures of medial compartment joint loading than those treated operatively, while sagittal plane group differences were not present. Statement of clinical relevance: The differences in medial knee joint loading at 5 years after operative and nonoperative management of ACL injury may have implications on the development of posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis.
© 2020 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; joint contact force; kinematics and kinetics; knee; rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32159239      PMCID: PMC7808330          DOI: 10.1002/jor.24652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  53 in total

1.  Long-term osteoarthritic changes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees.

Authors:  N M Jomha; D C Borton; A J Clingeleffer; L A Pinczewski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Walking gait asymmetries 6 months following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction predict 12-month patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Brian Pietrosimone; J Troy Blackburn; Darin A Padua; Steven J Pfeiffer; Hope C Davis; Brittney A Luc-Harkey; Matthew S Harkey; Laura Stanley Pietrosimone; Barnett S Frank; Robert Alexander Creighton; Ganesh M Kamath; Jeffery T Spang
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Predictors of knee joint loading after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wellsandt; Ashutosh Khandha; Kurt Manal; Michael J Axe; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Biomechanical evidence supporting a differential response to acute ACL injury.

Authors:  T L Chmielewski; K S Rudolph; G K Fitzgerald; M J Axe; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Does Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Functional and Radiographic Outcomes Over Nonoperative Management 5 Years After Injury?

Authors:  Elizabeth Wellsandt; Matthew J Failla; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Gait Mechanics After ACL Reconstruction Differ According to Medial Meniscal Treatment.

Authors:  Jacob J Capin; Ashutosh Khandha; Ryan Zarzycki; Kurt Manal; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  A decision-making scheme for returning patients to high-level activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  G K Fitzgerald; M J Axe; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  A progressive 5-week exercise therapy program leads to significant improvement in knee function early after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Ingrid Eitzen; Håvard Moksnes; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.751

9.  A pair-matched comparison of return to pivoting sports at 1 year in anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients after a nonoperative versus an operative treatment course.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; Ingrid Eitzen; Håvard Moksnes; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Hip joint biomechanics in those with and without post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  E Wellsandt; J A Zeni; M J Axe; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 2.063

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Current trends in the anterior cruciate ligament part II: evaluation, surgical technique, prevention, and rehabilitation.

Authors:  Volker Musahl; Ian D Engler; Ehab M Nazzal; Jonathan F Dalton; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Jonathan D Hughes; Stefano Zaffagnini; Francesco Della Villa; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Impact of Rehabilitation on Gait Kinematic following Grade II Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury among Wrestlers.

Authors:  Mohd Arshad Bari; Hussein Ali Hassan Alghazal; Shibili Nuhmani; Ahmad H Alghadir; Mohd Bilal Tafseer; Amir Iqbal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Knee joint biomechanics during gait improve from 3 to 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kelsey Neal; Jack R Williams; Abdulmajeed Alfayyadh; Jacob J Capin; Ashutosh Khandha; Kurt Manal; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.102

4.  Cartilage Matrix Degeneration Occurs within the First Year after ACLR and Is Associated with Impaired Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Ashley A Williams; Brittney C Deadwiler; Jason L Dragoo; Constance R Chu
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Effect of Time After Injury on Tibiofemoral Joint Kinematics in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knees During Gait.

Authors:  Changzhao Li; Yulin Lin; Willem A Kernkamp; Hong Xia; Zefeng Lin
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-07-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.