Literature DB >> 31209542

ACL hamstring grafts fixed using adjustable cortical suspension in both the femur and tibia demonstrate healing and integration on MRI at one year.

Sven Putnis1, Thomas Neri2, Samuel Grasso2, James Linklater3, Brett Fritsch2, David Parker2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present the clinical outcomes and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of adjustable cortical suspensory fixation for the femur and tibia in hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
METHODS: A cohort of 233 sequential patients was analysed for graft failure rate and subjective IKDC, Tegner and Lysholm scores. 144 validated 1-year MRIs assessed and correlated graft healing and tunnel widening.
RESULTS: At mean follow-up of 28 months ± 8.2 [median 26, range 12-49], the graft failure rate was 4.7%. Significant improvements were seen in all clinical scores (p < 0.001). MRI analysis showed 71% with fully integrated grafts in the tibia and 24% in the femur, with the remainder all showing greater than 50% integration. Graft signal was low and homogenous in 67% in the tibia, 29% in the intra-articular portion and 20% in the femur. One patient had greater than 50% high signal in the tibial graft and one in the intra-articular graft, all others demonstrated greater than 50% low signal. Both graft integration and signal were significantly better in the tibia than the femur (p < 0.01). Tunnel widening was 2.2 ± 1.4 mm and 2.7 ± 1.3 mm in the tibia and femur, respectively. Comparison of individual MRI appearances and overall clinical outcome at the same 12-month point demonstrated no consistent significant correlation.
CONCLUSION: Adjustable cortical suspensory fixation in both femoral and tibial tunnels provides good clinical outcomes and a low graft rupture rate. Grafts demonstrate healing with comparatively low tunnel widening. There was no consistent significant correlation between the appearances on MRI and clinical outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study, Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjustable suspension; Anterior cruciate ligament reconsruction; Magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31209542     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05556-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  42 in total

1.  Tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective evaluation of hamstring and patella tendon grafts.

Authors:  M G Clatworthy; P Annear; J U Bulow; R J Bartlett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  The "ligamentization" process in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: what happens to the human graft? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven Claes; Peter Verdonk; Ramses Forsyth; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Biology and augmentation of tendon-bone insertion repair.

Authors:  Ppy Lui; P Zhang; Km Chan; L Qin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  MRI-based tendon bone healing is related to the clinical functional scores at the first year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft.

Authors:  Hong-Yun Li; Hong Li; Zi-Ying Wu; Ji-Wu Chen; Shi-Yi Chen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions: Comparison Between Fixed-Loop and Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Devices.

Authors:  Nam-Hong Choi; Bong-Seok Yang; Brian N Victoroff
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 6.  Migration of "bioabsorbable" screws in ACL repair. How much do we know? A systematic review.

Authors:  Hélder Pereira; Hélder M D Pereira; Vítor M Correlo; Joana Silva-Correia; Joaquim M Oliveira; Rui L Reis; Rui L Reis Ceng; João Espregueira-Mendes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Incorporation of Hamstring Grafts Within the Tibial Tunnel After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Suspensory Fixation Versus Interference Screws.

Authors:  Philippe Colombet; Nicolas Graveleau; Stephane Jambou
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Tendon healing in a bone tunnel differs at the tunnel entrance versus the tunnel exit: an effect of graft-tunnel motion?

Authors:  Scott A Rodeo; Sumito Kawamura; Hyon-Jeong Kim; Christian Dynybil; Liang Ying
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at a Minimum of 2 Years Using Adjustable Suspensory Fixation in Both the Femur and Tibia: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Philippe Colombet; Mo Saffarini; Nicolas Bouguennec
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2018-10-22
View more
  2 in total

1.  Anterior cruciate ligament autograft maturation on sequential postoperative MRI is not correlated with clinical outcome and anterior knee stability.

Authors:  Andrea Achtnich; Patricia M Lutz; Vincent Schütte; Klaus Woertler; Andreas B Imhoff; Lukas Willinger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.114

2.  Post-Operative Results of ACL Reconstruction Techniques on Single-Leg Hop Tests in Athletes: Hamstring Autograft vs. Hamstring Grafts Fixed Using Adjustable Cortical Suspension in Both the Femur and Tibia.

Authors:  Lokman Kehribar; Ali Kerim Yılmaz; Emre Karaduman; Menderes Kabadayı; Özgür Bostancı; Serkan Sürücü; Mahmud Aydın; Mahir Mahiroğulları
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.