Literature DB >> 31119338

Younger age and hamstring tendon graft are associated with higher IKDC 2000 and KOOS scores during the first year after ACL reconstruction.

Nina Magnitskaya1,2, Caroline Mouton3, Alli Gokeler4,5, Christian Nuehrenboerger6, Dietrich Pape3, Romain Seil3,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although reference values in healthy subjects have been published for both the International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 subjective knee form (IKDC 2000) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), data obtained during the first year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) are sparse. The aim was to establish patient reference values for both questionnaires at different time points and depending on nine individual patient characteristics during the first year after ACL-R.
METHODS: Prospectively recorded data from a hospital-based registry were retrospectively extracted from the database. IKDC 2000 and KOOS questionnaires were self-administered pre-operatively and 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 and 12 months following primary ACL-R. Score values were compared according to nine individual patient criteria: gender, age, body mass index, level of activity, involvement in competition, previous contralateral knee injury and/or surgery, graft type, meniscal repair and/or cartilage lesions. The feature which had a significant and consistent impact on the outcomes was considered as main reference.
RESULTS: Two-hundred and nighty-eight patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the score values increased over time after ACL-R. At 12 months, they were significantly greater than at any other time point (p < 0.05). The main individual feature influencing the IKDC 2000 score was age. Patients below 30 years of age had up to 9 points higher IKDC 2000 score values at all time points (p < 0.05). The main individual characteristic influencing the KOOS score was graft type. Patients with hamstring tendon grafts (STGR) had up to 15 points higher KOOS score values than patients with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) grafts during the first months after ACL-R (p < 0.05). At 12 months, no differences in KOOS score values could be identified anymore.
CONCLUSIONS: Younger age (< 30 years) and STGR grafts were related to higher IKDC 2000 and KOOS score values within the first year after primary ACL-R. The patient reference values adjusted to age and graft provided in this study may help to identify patients with lower outcomes within the first year after ACL-R. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; IKDC 2000; KOOS; PRO; Patient-reported outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31119338     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05516-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  27 in total

1.  Factors affecting outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective study with a six-year follow-up.

Authors:  L R Swirtun; P Renström
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 4.221

2.  The UK National Ligament Registry Report 2015.

Authors:  Ayman Gabr; Sean O'Leary; Tim Spalding; Steven Bollen; Fares Haddad
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Results from the Swedish national anterior cruciate ligament register.

Authors:  Joanna Kvist; Jüri Kartus; Jon Karlsson; Magnus Forssblad
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Timeline for Maximal Subjective Outcome Improvement After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Avinesh Agarwalla; Richard N Puzzitiello; Joseph N Liu; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Anirudh K Gowd; Nikhil N Verma; Brian J Cole; Brian Forsythe
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients.

Authors:  Mattias Ahldén; Kristian Samuelsson; Ninni Sernert; Magnus Forssblad; Jón Karlsson; Jüri Kartus
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  A pair-matched comparison of return to pivoting sports at 1 year in anterior cruciate ligament-injured patients after a nonoperative versus an operative treatment course.

Authors:  Hege Grindem; Ingrid Eitzen; Håvard Moksnes; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; May Arna Risberg
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  The first results from the Danish ACL reconstruction registry: epidemiologic and 2 year follow-up results from 5,818 knee ligament reconstructions.

Authors:  Martin Lind; Frank Menhert; Alma B Pedersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS).

Authors:  Natalie J Collins; Devyani Misra; David T Felson; Kay M Crossley; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

9.  Differences in physician and patient ratings of items used to assess hip disorders.

Authors:  RobRoy L Martin; Nicholas G Mohtadi; Marc R Safran; Michael Leunig; Hal D Martin; Joseph McCarthy; Carlos A Guanche; Bryan T Kelly; J W Thomas Byrd; John C Clohisy; Marc J Philippon; Jon K Sekiya
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Knee complaints vary with age and gender in the adult population. Population-based reference data for the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).

Authors:  Przemyslaw T Paradowski; Stefan Bergman; Anne Sundén-Lundius; L Stefan Lohmander; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  5 in total

1.  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and reliability of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form and the tampa scale for kinesiophobia (TSK) into Hebrew.

Authors:  Tomer Yona; Moshe Yaniv; Jonathan Rom; Elad Damri; Arielle G Fischer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 2.928

2.  [Correlation between graft maturity and knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].

Authors:  Rongjin Chen; Xinyi Gu; Xianxiang Xiang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-06-15

3.  Skeletally immature patient showed lower graft maturity than skeletally mature patient after ACL reconstruction with a rounded rectangular femoral tunnel.

Authors:  Kazuki Asai; Junsuke Nakase; Kengo Shimozaki; Rikuto Yoshimizu; Mitsuhiro Kimura; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Determining the Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for Patient-Reported Outcome Scores After Primary ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Young-Sik Jeon; Ja-Woon Lee; Soo-Hyun Kim; Sang-Gyun Kim; Young-Ha Kim; Ji Hoon Bae
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-05-05

5.  Quadriceps Strength and Kinesiophobia Predict Long-Term Function After ACL Reconstruction: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.

Authors:  Joshua J Van Wyngaarden; Cale Jacobs; Katherine Thompson; Molly Eads; Darren Johnson; Mary Lloyd Ireland; Brian Noehren
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.843

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.