Literature DB >> 28100734

Does the Superior Colliculus Control Perceptual Sensitivity or Choice Bias during Attention? Evidence from a Multialternative Decision Framework.

Devarajan Sridharan1, Nicholas A Steinmetz2, Tirin Moore2,3, Eric I Knudsen2.   

Abstract

Distinct networks in the forebrain and the midbrain coordinate to control spatial attention. The critical involvement of the superior colliculus (SC)-the central structure in the midbrain network-in visuospatial attention has been shown by four seminal, published studies in monkeys (Macaca mulatta) performing multialternative tasks. However, due to the lack of a mechanistic framework for interpreting behavioral data in such tasks, the nature of the SC's contribution to attention remains unclear. Here we present and validate a novel decision framework for analyzing behavioral data in multialternative attention tasks. We apply this framework to re-examine the behavioral evidence from these published studies. Our model is a multidimensional extension to signal detection theory that distinguishes between two major classes of attentional mechanisms: those that alter the quality of sensory information or "sensitivity," and those that alter the selective gating of sensory information or "choice bias." Model-based simulations and model-based analyses of data from these published studies revealed a converging pattern of results that indicated that choice-bias changes, rather than sensitivity changes, were the primary outcome of SC manipulation. Our results suggest that the SC contributes to attentional performance predominantly by generating a spatial choice bias for stimuli at a selected location, and that this bias operates downstream of forebrain mechanisms that enhance sensitivity. The findings lead to a testable mechanistic framework of how the midbrain and forebrain networks interact to control spatial attention. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Attention involves the selection of the most relevant information for differential sensory processing and decision making. While the mechanisms by which attention alters sensory encoding (sensitivity control) are well studied, the mechanisms by which attention alters decisional weighting of sensory evidence (choice-bias control) are poorly understood. Here, we introduce a model of multialternative decision making that distinguishes bias from sensitivity effects in attention tasks. With our model, we simulate experimental data from four seminal studies that microstimulated or inactivated a key attention-related midbrain structure, the superior colliculus (SC). We demonstrate that the experimental effects of SC manipulation are entirely consistent with the SC controlling attention by changing choice bias, thereby shedding new light on how the brain mediates attention.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/370480-32$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention mechanisms; behavior; microstimulation and inactivation; midbrain; multialternative decisions; signal-detection theory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28100734      PMCID: PMC5242403          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4505-14.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  49 in total

Review 1.  Statistical decision theory to relate neurons to behavior in the study of covert visual attention.

Authors:  Miguel P Eckstein; Matthew F Peterson; Binh T Pham; Jason A Droll
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Perceptual decisions between multiple directions of visual motion.

Authors:  Mamiko Niwa; Jochen Ditterich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Interval bias in 2AFC detection tasks: sorting out the artifacts.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Selective disinhibition: A unified neural mechanism for predictive and post hoc attentional selection.

Authors:  Devarajan Sridharan; Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Separating decision and encoding noise in signal detection tasks.

Authors:  Carlos Alexander Cabrera; Zhong-Lin Lu; Barbara Anne Dosher
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  New advances in understanding decisions among multiple alternatives.

Authors:  Anne K Churchland; Jochen Ditterich
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 7.  Spatial neglect and attention networks.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 8.  Superior colliculus and visual spatial attention.

Authors:  Richard J Krauzlis; Lee P Lovejoy; Alexandre Zénon
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 12.449

9.  Eye movement preparation modulates neuronal responses in area V4 when dissociated from attentional demands.

Authors:  Nicholas A Steinmetz; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Subcortical modulation of attention counters change blindness.

Authors:  James Cavanaugh; Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 6.709

View more
  19 in total

1.  Changes in perceptual sensitivity related to spatial cues depends on subcortical activity.

Authors:  Lee P Lovejoy; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Space-Specific Deficits in Visual Orientation Discrimination Caused by Lesions in the Midbrain Stimulus Selection Network.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen; Jason S Schwarz; Phyllis F Knudsen; Devarajan Sridharan
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Activity in LIP, But not V4, Matches Performance When Attention is Spread.

Authors:  Fabrice Arcizet; Koorosh Mirpour; Daniel J Foster; James W Bisley
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Attention can be subdivided into neurobiological components corresponding to distinct behavioral effects.

Authors:  Thomas Zhihao Luo; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Attentional Changes in Either Criterion or Sensitivity Are Associated with Robust Modulations in Lateral Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Thomas Zhihao Luo; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Foveal vision anticipates defining features of eye movement targets.

Authors:  Lisa M Kroell; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 7.  Neural Circuits That Mediate Selective Attention: A Comparative Perspective.

Authors:  Eric I Knudsen
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 8.  Neural mechanisms of sensorimotor transformation and action selection.

Authors:  Rafiq Huda; Michael J Goard; Gerald N Pho; Mriganka Sur
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 3.386

9.  Midbrain activity shapes high-level visual properties in the primate temporal cortex.

Authors:  Amarender R Bogadhi; Leor N Katz; Anil Bollimunta; David A Leopold; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Diminished Cortical Excitation and Elevated Inhibition During Perceptual Impairments in a Mouse Model of Autism.

Authors:  Joseph Del Rosario; Anderson Speed; Hayley Arrowood; Cara Motz; Machelle Pardue; Bilal Haider
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.