Literature DB >> 22946636

Clinical impact of an open-irrigated radiofrequency catheter with direct force measurement on atrial fibrillation ablation.

Martin Martinek1, Christine Lemes, Elisabeth Sigmund, Michael Derndorfer, Josef Aichinger, Siegmund Winter, Hans-Joachim Nesser, Helmut Pürerfellner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electrode-tissue contact is crucial for adequate lesion formation in radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).
OBJECTIVE: We assessed the impact of direct catheter force measurement on acute procedural parameters during RFCA of atrial fibrillation (AF).
METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients (28 male) with paroxysmal AF who underwent their first procedure of circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) were assigned to either RFCA using (1) a standard 3.5-mm open-irrigated-tip catheter or (2) a catheter with contact force measurement capabilities. Using the endpoint of PVI with entry and exit block, acute procedural parameters were assessed.
RESULTS: Procedural data showed a remarkable decline in ablation time (radiofrequency time needed for PVI) from 50.5 ± 15.9 to 39.0 ± 11.0 minutes (P = 0.007) with a reduction in overall procedure duration from 185 ± 46 to 154 ± 39 minutes (P = 0.022). In parallel, the total energy delivered could be significantly reduced from 70,926 ± 19,470 to 58,511 ± 14,655 Ws (P = 0.019). The number of acute PV reconnections declined from 36% to 12% (P = 0.095).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of contact force sensing technology is able to significantly reduce ablation and procedure times in PVI. In addition, energy delivery is substantially reduced by avoiding radiofrequency ablation in positions with insufficient surface contact. Procedural efficacy and safety of this new feature have to be evaluated in larger cohorts. ©2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22946636     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03503.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  37 in total

1.  SmartTouch™ - The Emerging Role of Contact Force Technology in Complex Catheter Ablation.

Authors:  Stephen P Page; Mehul Dhinoja
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2012-09

2.  MEMS-Based Flexible Force Sensor for Tri-Axial Catheter Contact Force Measurement.

Authors:  Hardik J Pandya; Jun Sheng; Jaydev P Desai
Journal:  J Microelectromech Syst       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.417

Review 3.  Conceptual Design and Procedure for an Autonomous Intramyocardial Injection Catheter.

Authors:  Weyland Cheng; Peter K Law
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 5.  Contact Force and Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  W Ullah; R J Schilling; T Wong
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

6.  2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Developed in partnership with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society (ECAS); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), American Heart Association (AHA), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Endorsed by the governing bodies of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the American Heart Association, the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; José Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 7.  Radiation Dose is Significantly Reduced by Use of Contact Force Sensing Catheter During Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Giuseppe Stabile; Antonio De Simone; Francesco Solimene; Assunta Iuliano; Vincenzo La Rocca; Vincenzo Schillaci; Alfonso Panella; Gergana Shopova; Felice Nappi; Francesco Urraro; Giovanni Russo; Giovanni Napolitano; Paola Chiariello
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

8.  Randomized comparison of contact force-guided versus conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation: prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of electrical reconnections and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Kohki Nakamura; Shigeto Naito; Takehito Sasaki; Masahiro Nakano; Kentaro Minami; Yosuke Nakatani; Kentaro Ikeda; Eiji Yamashita; Koji Kumagai; Nobusada Funabashi; Shigeru Oshima
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Which is the best catheter to perform atrial fibrillation ablation? A comparison between standard ThermoCool, SmartTouch, and Surround Flow catheters.

Authors:  Luigi Sciarra; Paolo Golia; Andrea Natalizia; Ermenegildo De Ruvo; Serena Dottori; Antonio Scarà; Alessio Borrelli; Lucia De Luca; Marco Rebecchi; Alessandro Fagagnini; Alberto Bandini; Fabrizio Guarracini; Marcello Galvani; Leonardo Calò
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Impact of real-time contact force and impedance measurement in pulmonary vein isolation procedures for treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Reza Wakili; Sebastian Clauss; Viola Schmidt; Michael Ulbrich; Anton Hahnefeld; Franziska Schüssler; Johannes Siebermair; Stefan Kääb; Heidi L Estner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.