Literature DB >> 22945611

Roll aftereffects: influence of tilt and inter-stimulus interval.

Benjamin T Crane1.   

Abstract

A theme in sensory perception is that exposure to a stimulus causes perception of subsequent stimuli to be shifted in the opposite direction. Such phenomenon is known as aftereffect and has been extensively described in the visual system as well as recently described for the vestibular system during translation. It is known from aviation studies that after a maneuver in roll, pilots can experience a false perception of roll in the opposite direction. The magnitude and duration of this effect as well as the potential influence of the gravity vector have not previously been defined. In the current paper this roll aftereffect (RAE) is examined in response to whole-body roll about an earth-horizontal axis in eight healthy human subjects. The peak velocity of a 0.5-s-duration roll was varied based on previous responses to find the point where subjects perceived no motion. Without a preceding stimulus, the starting position (upright, 9° left, or 9° right) did not influence roll perception. The RAE was measured in a completely dark room using an adapting (first interval) stimulus consisting of 9° of roll over 1.5 s (peak velocity, 12°/s), delivered 0.5, 3, or 6 s prior to test (second interval) stimulus. A significant RAE was seen in all subjects. Half a second after the adapting stimulus, a test stimulus had to be on average 1.5 ± 0.4°/s in the opposite direction to be perceived as stationary. When the subject remained upright after the adapting stimulus, the RAE diminished with time, although it remained significantly larger at 3 and 6 s when the subject remained tilted after the adapting stimulus. These data demonstrate that roll perception can be influenced by small preceding stimuli and tilt causes a persistence of the RAE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22945611      PMCID: PMC3472151          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3243-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  Auditory adaptation in vocal affect perception.

Authors:  Patricia E G Bestelmeyer; Julien Rouger; Lisa M DeBruine; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-11

2.  Velocity storage contribution to vestibular self-motion perception in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  G Bertolini; S Ramat; J Laurens; C J Bockisch; S Marti; D Straumann; A Palla
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Effect of adaptation to telescopic spectacles on the initial human horizontal vestibuloocular reflex.

Authors:  B T Crane; J L Demer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Perceptual manifestations of fast neural plasticity: motion priming, rapid motion aftereffect and perceptual sensitization.

Authors:  Ryota Kanai; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Vestibular thresholds for yaw rotation about an earth-vertical axis as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Luzia Grabherr; Keyvan Nicoucar; Fred W Mast; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Inertial vestibular coding of motion: concepts and evidence.

Authors:  B J Hess; D E Angelaki
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  Tilt perception during dynamic linear acceleration.

Authors:  S H Seidman; L Telford; G D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Habituation and adaptation of the vestibuloocular reflex: a model of differential control by the vestibulocerebellum.

Authors:  H Cohen; B Cohen; T Raphan; W Waespe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Do humans show velocity-storage in the vertical rVOR?

Authors:  G Bertolini; C J Bockisch; D Straumann; D S Zee; S Ramat
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.453

10.  Rotational kinematics of the human vestibuloocular reflex. II. Velocity steps.

Authors:  D Tweed; M Fetter; D Sievering; H Misslisch; E Koenig
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Dynamics of individual perceptual decisions.

Authors:  Daniel M Merfeld; Torin K Clark; Yue M Lu; Faisal Karmali
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Whole body motion-detection tasks can yield much lower thresholds than direction-recognition tasks: implications for the role of vibration.

Authors:  Shomesh E Chaudhuri; Faisal Karmali; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Effect of eye position during human visual-vestibular integration of heading perception.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Human yaw rotation aftereffects with brief duration rotations are inconsistent with velocity storage.

Authors:  Andrew J Coniglio; Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-10

5.  A quantitative confidence signal detection model: 1. Fitting psychometric functions.

Authors:  Yongwoo Yi; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Perceptual precision of passive body tilt is consistent with statistically optimal cue integration.

Authors:  Koeun Lim; Faisal Karmali; Keyvan Nicoucar; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Improving self-motion perception and balance through roll tilt perceptual training.

Authors:  Andrew R Wagner; Megan J Kobel; Junichi Tajino; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.974

8.  The influence of head and body tilt on human fore-aft translation perception.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Determining thresholds using adaptive procedures and psychometric fits: evaluating efficiency using theory, simulations, and human experiments.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Shomesh E Chaudhuri; Yongwoo Yi; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Visual and vestibular perceptual thresholds each demonstrate better precision at specific frequencies and also exhibit optimal integration.

Authors:  Faisal Karmali; Koeun Lim; Daniel M Merfeld
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.