OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the minimum microbubble dose for ultrasound molecular imaging to achieve statistically significant detection of angiogenesis in a mouse model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The preburst minus postburst method was implemented on a Verasonics ultrasound research scanner using a multiframe compounding pulse inversion imaging sequence. Biotinylated lipid (distearoyl phosphatidylcholine-based) microbubbles that were conjugated with antivascular endothelial growth factor 2 (VEGFR2) antibody (MBVEGFR2) or isotype control antibody (MBControl) were injected into mice carrying adenocarcinoma xenografts. Different injection doses ranging from 5 × 10 to 1 × 10 microbubbles per mouse were evaluated to determine the minimum diagnostically effective dose. RESULTS: The proposed imaging sequence was able to achieve statistically significant detection (P < 0.05, n = 5) of VEGFR2 in tumors with a minimum MBVEGFR2 injection dose of only 5 × 10 microbubbles per mouse (distearoyl phosphatidylcholine at 0.053 ng/g mouse body mass). Nonspecific adhesion of MBControl at the same injection dose was negligible. In addition, the targeted contrast ultrasound signal of MBVEGFR2 decreased with lower microbubble doses, whereas nonspecific adhesion of MBControl increased with higher microbubble doses. CONCLUSIONS: The dose of 5 × 10 microbubbles per animal is now the lowest injection dose on record for ultrasound molecular imaging to achieve statistically significant detection of molecular targets in vivo. Findings in this study provide us with further guidance for future developments of clinically translatable ultrasound molecular imaging applications using a lower dose of microbubbles.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the minimum microbubble dose for ultrasound molecular imaging to achieve statistically significant detection of angiogenesis in a mouse model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The preburst minus postburst method was implemented on a Verasonics ultrasound research scanner using a multiframe compounding pulse inversion imaging sequence. Biotinylated lipid (distearoyl phosphatidylcholine-based) microbubbles that were conjugated with antivascular endothelial growth factor 2 (VEGFR2) antibody (MBVEGFR2) or isotype control antibody (MBControl) were injected into mice carrying adenocarcinoma xenografts. Different injection doses ranging from 5 × 10 to 1 × 10 microbubbles per mouse were evaluated to determine the minimum diagnostically effective dose. RESULTS: The proposed imaging sequence was able to achieve statistically significant detection (P < 0.05, n = 5) of VEGFR2 in tumors with a minimum MBVEGFR2 injection dose of only 5 × 10 microbubbles per mouse (distearoyl phosphatidylcholine at 0.053 ng/g mouse body mass). Nonspecific adhesion of MBControl at the same injection dose was negligible. In addition, the targeted contrast ultrasound signal of MBVEGFR2 decreased with lower microbubble doses, whereas nonspecific adhesion of MBControl increased with higher microbubble doses. CONCLUSIONS: The dose of 5 × 10 microbubbles per animal is now the lowest injection dose on record for ultrasound molecular imaging to achieve statistically significant detection of molecular targets in vivo. Findings in this study provide us with further guidance for future developments of clinically translatable ultrasound molecular imaging applications using a lower dose of microbubbles.
Authors: A L Klibanov; J J Rychak; W C Yang; S Alikhani; B Li; S Acton; J R Lindner; K Ley; S Kaul Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2006 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Flordeliza S Villanueva; Erxiong Lu; Shivani Bowry; Sevgi Kilic; Eric Tom; Jianjun Wang; Joan Gretton; John J Pacella; William R Wagner Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-01-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jason M Warram; Anna G Sorace; Reshu Saini; Heidi R Umphrey; Kurt R Zinn; Kenneth Hoyt Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Beat A Kaufmann; John M Sanders; Christopher Davis; Aris Xie; Patrick Aldred; Ian J Sarembock; Jonathan R Lindner Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-06-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Susanne M Stieger; Paul A Dayton; Mark A Borden; Charles F Caskey; Stephen M Griffey; Erik R Wisner; Katherine W Ferrara Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Elizabeth B Herbst; Sunil Unnikrishnan; Shiying Wang; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack; Frank William Mauldin Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Elizabeth B Herbst; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack; F William Mauldin Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2021-08-08 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Shiying Wang; Sunil Unnikrishnan; Elizabeth B Herbst; Alexander L Klibanov; Frank William Mauldin; John A Hossack Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Klazina Kooiman; Tom van Rooij; Bin Qin; Frits Mastik; Hendrik J Vos; Michel Versluis; Alexander L Klibanov; Nico de Jong; Flordeliza S Villanueva; Xucai Chen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-07-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Feifei Zhao; Sunil Unnikrishnan; Elizabeth B Herbst; Alexander L Klibanov; F William Mauldin; John A Hossack Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 10.065