Literature DB >> 22941359

Tuning of the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) to air- and bone-conducted sound stimulation in superior canal dehiscence.

Alexander S Zhang1, Sendhil Govender, James G Colebatch.   

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated the frequency selectivity of air-conducted (AC) and bone-conducted (BC) stimuli in eliciting ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs). In this study, frequency tuning of the oVEMP was assessed in patients with superior canal dehiscence (SCD) and compared with responses previously reported for healthy subjects. Six (five unilateral) SCD patients were stimulated using AC sound (50-1,200 Hz) and BC transmastoid vibration (50-1,000 Hz). Stimuli were delivered at two standardized intensities: one the same as previously used for healthy controls and the other at 10 dB above vestibular threshold (a similar relative intensity to that used in controls). For AC stimulation, SCD patients had larger oVEMP amplitudes across all frequencies tested for both stimulus intensities. Normalized tuning curves demonstrated greater high-frequency responses with the stronger stimulus. For BC stimulation, larger oVEMP amplitudes were produced at frequencies at and above 100 Hz using standard intensity stimuli. For the matched intensity above vestibular threshold, enhancement of the oVEMP response was present in SCD patients for 500-800 Hz only. We conclude that SCD causes greater facilitation for AC than BC stimuli. The high-frequency response is likely to originate from the superior (anterior) canal and is consistent with models of inner ear changes occurring in SCD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22941359     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3240-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

Review 1.  Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in patients with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  K Brantberg; J Bergenius; A Tribukait
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Head taps evoke a crossed vestibulo-ocular reflex.

Authors:  S Iwasaki; L A McGarvie; G M Halmagyi; A M Burgess; J Kim; J G Colebatch; I S Curthoys
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  A utricular origin of frequency tuning to low-frequency vibration in the human vestibular system?

Authors:  Neil P M Todd; Sally M Rosengren; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Frequency-tuning characteristics of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials induced by air-conducted tone bursts.

Authors:  Hong Ju Park; In-Sik Lee; Jung Eun Shin; Yeo Jin Lee; Mun Su Park
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Superior canal dehiscence causes abnormal vestibular bone-conducted tuning.

Authors:  A S Zhang; S Govender; J G Colebatch
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  L B Minor; D Solomon; J S Zinreich; D S Zee
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-03

7.  Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in superior canal dehiscence.

Authors:  S M Rosengren; S T Aw; G M Halmagyi; N P McAngus Todd; J G Colebatch
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Acoustically responsive fibers in the vestibular nerve of the cat.

Authors:  M P McCue; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Clinical, experimental, and theoretical investigations of the effect of superior semicircular canal dehiscence on hearing mechanisms.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Jocelyn E Songer; Hideko H Nakajima; Kelly M Brinsko; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo.

Authors:  Anthony A Mikulec; Michael J McKenna; Mitchell J Ramsey; John J Rosowski; Barbara S Herrmann; Steven D Rauch; Hugh D Curtin; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical utility of ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs).

Authors:  Konrad P Weber; Sally M Rosengren
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Band limited chirp stimulation in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Leif Erik Walther; Mario Cebulla
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Semicircular Canal Pressure Changes During High-intensity Acoustic Stimulation.

Authors:  Anne K Maxwell; Renee M Banakis Hartl; Nathaniel T Greene; Victor Benichoux; Jameson K Mattingly; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 4.  The Clinical Utility of Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials in the Diagnosis of Ménière's Disease.

Authors:  Maxime Maheu; Jenny Marylin Alvarado-Umanzor; Audrey Delcenserie; François Champoux
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials recorded from miniature pigs and rats.

Authors:  Li Ya; Zhang Yan; Qiu ShiWei; Yuan Na; Shi Xi; Qiao Yuehua; Shi-Ming Yang
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2016-06-27

6.  Bone-Conducted oVEMP Latency Delays Assist in the Differential Diagnosis of Large Air-Conducted oVEMP Amplitudes.

Authors:  Rachael L Taylor; John S Magnussen; Belinda Kwok; Allison S Young; Berina Ihtijarevic; Emma C Argaet; Nicole Reid; Cheryl Rivas; Jacob M Pogson; Sally M Rosengren; G Michael Halmagyi; Miriam S Welgampola
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.003

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.