Literature DB >> 19892592

Frequency-tuning characteristics of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials induced by air-conducted tone bursts.

Hong Ju Park1, In-Sik Lee, Jung Eun Shin, Yeo Jin Lee, Mun Su Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To better characterize both ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) responses at different frequencies of sound in 20 normal subjects.
METHODS: Cervical and ocular VEMPs were recorded. The intensities of sound stimulation decreased from the maximal intensity, until no responses were evoked. Thresholds, amplitudes, latencies and interaural amplitude difference ratio (IADR) at the maximal stimulation were calculated.
RESULTS: Both tests showed the similar frequency tuning, with the lowest threshold and highest amplitude for 500-Hz tone-burst stimuli. Sound stimulation at 500Hz showed the response rates of 100% in both tests. Cervical VEMPs showed higher incidence than ocular VEMPs. Ocular VEMP thresholds were significantly higher than those of cervical VEMP. Cervical VEMP amplitudes were significantly higher than ocular VEMP amplitudes. IADRs of ocular and cervical VEMPs did not differ significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: Ocular VEMP showed the similar frequency tuning to cervical VEMP. Cervical VEMP responses showed higher incidence, lower thresholds and larger amplitudes than ocular VEMP. SIGNIFICANCE: Cervical VEMP is a more reliable measure than ocular VEMP, though the results of both tests will be complementary. Five hundred Hertz is the optimal frequency to use. Copyright 2009 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19892592     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  28 in total

1.  [Recording cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Part 2: influencing factors, evaluation of findings and clinical significance].

Authors:  L E Walther; K Hörmann; O Pfaar
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in response to three test positions and two frequencies.

Authors:  Janvi K Todai; Sharon L Congdon; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Helen S Cohen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Tuning of the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) to AC sound shows two separate peaks.

Authors:  Alexander S Zhang; Sendhil Govender; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Clinical utility of ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs).

Authors:  Konrad P Weber; Sally M Rosengren
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Tuning of the ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) to air- and bone-conducted sound stimulation in superior canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Alexander S Zhang; Sendhil Govender; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Band limited chirp stimulation in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Leif Erik Walther; Mario Cebulla
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Frequency and phase effects on cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) to air-conducted sound.

Authors:  Sendhil Govender; Danielle L Dennis; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Big Stimulus, Little Ears: Safety in Administering Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Children.

Authors:  Megan L A Thomas; Denis Fitzpatrick; Ryan McCreery; Kristen L Janky
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials using air-conducted sound: test parameters and normative data in healthy children; effect of body position on threshold.

Authors:  Ioannis Kastanioudakis; Panagiotis Saravakos; Theodoros Leontis; Dimitrios G Balatsouras; Nausica Ziavra
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Effects of age on the tuning of the cVEMP and oVEMP.

Authors:  Erin G Piker; Gary P Jacobson; Robert F Burkard; Devin L McCaslin; Linda J Hood
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.